jdege wrote:Amazing, isn't it, how all the organizations except the Dorrs' are screwing over gun owners, and yet the Dorr brothers never actually do anything?
that's always how it works with the Dorrs, same story in every situation
jdege wrote:Amazing, isn't it, how all the organizations except the Dorrs' are screwing over gun owners, and yet the Dorr brothers never actually do anything?
photogpat wrote:Just checking. Been awhile since I’ve logged in…just seeing who’s still here (and who’s a bot).
Lumpy wrote:It's late, I'm tired and I'm not finding a breakdown by party; would someone tabulate this for me please?
Bearcatrp wrote:How about we jump in one of those Supreme Court cars when they are driving around and tell them it’s a public place so thought I would jump in a public place. See how they like it.
samginko wrote:Makes sense. Your residence is on a public street. So, interior of your house is a public place.
Zarthan wrote:Brian,
Are any other groups suing the state over this?
Rip Van Winkle wrote:This case should be a slam dunk, except it's in marxist'sota.
Jackpine Savage wrote:I believe this was the exact reason that the first Carry law was thrown out so it should be a slam dunk, unless the Democrat judges are hypocrites.
dismal wrote:Will the ex-VP candydate sign it?
Jackpine Savage wrote:atomic41 wrote:Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.
Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.
Didn't they answer that question with their ruling on serial number requirements for firearms?
Did they finally rule on the serial number case? If so I missed it.