I'm surprised they're not banning cars.

jdege wrote:It's sad when we have to celebrate courts being able to read and understand the plain text of the statute.

It appears that at least two, including the chief justice, can't read The third either wasn't interested, protesting, or something?

Took them long enough. I'm sure they worked really hard to come up with some convoluted legal argument to make serial numbers required. I am frankly surprised that they didn't.

jdege wrote:Remember, the Assault Weapons Ban was passed through reconciliation.

I did not remember that. I do remember standing in Bill's Gun Shop buying a Colt HBAR when one of the houses passed it, I think it was the Senate.

It doesn't necessarily have to go to a conference committee, it depends whether the other house body can pass the amended bill.

If the Senate were to add the SHORT Act to the budget reconciliation bill, would the bill then go back to the House for passage as amended? Yep. It's a certainty that the Senate will make changes to the bill, most likely adding in their own pork, so maybe the Short act will just fly in under the ra...

Even with a retention holster I think it is a bad idea to open carry in public. For one, some criminals are familiar with retention holsters, and manage to get cops guns regardless. Two, even if they can't immediately get the gun, it gets you into a physical altercation which the majority of carrier...

Mrgunsngear's update on the process. It's still possible. Keep up the pressure.

RT 14:39

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if0bi1MLm9Q

Here's an interesting video from T-Rex arms. He was in DC meeting with his Tennessee senator while the games were being played in the Ways and Means committee. He suggests that it could be the ATF lobbying effort that's keeping suppressors in the NFA. The web of lies and liars in DC is absolute. But...

Republicans, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Spineless bastards.

The guy that reformed the NFA process, can't remember his name, was a gun grabber that recently got fired. A little justice.

I think the improvement in turnaround time came because the AFT thought they were going to be registering millions of pistols with braces as SBRs. FTATF.

Can someone give me the CliffsNotes version, why it's in anyone's interest to keep suppressors NFA? This is the only reason I can think of. There are several companies whose business model is to make it easy to go through the NFA process. They handle the fingerprints, photos, and paperwork. Silence...

Nice!

Two friends had about a two day turn around last summer. Another one took three weeks. Things are much improved.

This a video from John Crump news. There is a bill, HR 404, The Hearing Protection Act, that is having a difficult time getting out of the Ways and Means committee. Turns out Chris Cox, (still a POS), is lobbying on behalf of a private company to keep suppressors in the NFA. The committee needs to h...