usnret wrote:I thought that bills could not have numerous bills crammed into a bill. Just like when the original carry permit bill was shot down. But then again the DFL doesn't care about the rules.

All they need to do is put the word "omnibus" in front of it.

Larry

I am not a lawyer . . . however, my reading of what passed seems to allow continued private party transfers with a Carry or Purchase Permit. I had been requiring that whenever I sold something anyway, so maybe it won't be too much of a change for some of us. I don't think FFLs will see much of a dif...

The only thing I disagree with is the part of the ATF letter that says the maker must mark a receiver if the home-built gun is sold. That's what I'm calling BS on, since I've never seen anything in the law that supports that statement. Again, I'm not going to be a test case but it really chaps my h...

Thanks for posting the letter. That is interesting, especially since it references regs related to FFL's and not non-licensees. Most home gunsmiths mark receivers they make. First, it's just good practice in case the firearm is ever stolen. Second, receivers are typically heat treated which makes i...

Scratch wrote:Sorry Larry... I thought you were a member here.

No biggie . . . I looked around when I joined today, and think I might stay around . . .

Larry

(A6) Does the GCA prohibit anyone from making a handgun, shotgun or rifle? With certain exceptions a firearm may be made by a nonlicensee provided it is not for sale and the maker is not prohibited from possessing firearms. However, a person is prohibited from assembling a nonsporting semi-automati...