MNGunTalk.com • Search

It is sad to see the teen drug epidemic with many reports of burglarized homes all over southern MN. Your cozy, safe way of life with unlocked doors is soon coming to an end. The best thing I see here is an innocent verdict to send a strong message to all would be intruders "DONT DO IT". A...

Gunsmith, you are talking about jurors who grew up in a culture where guns are scary and not legal in public, until recently anyway.

BRSmith wrote: Pretty touchy subject around here.

Curious about that. Divided opinion or?

How does one gain the right to kill someone? "Has the right to use deadly force"???? Sound better? Words matter. I see they are going to make a big deal about his choice of derogatory cuss terms. "He used the 'B' word, let's make it a hate crime". I know from personal experience...

The truly sad part about the rampant dishonesty of this rag is that it will serve as a historical record for hundreds of years to come. Is there no HONOR and INTEGRITY?

And assuming you are a Minnesota resident Gonna let myself get a bonk on the head here, but I thought "standard" kinds of long arms could be sold to residents of other states and that restriction was only for handguns and ubiquitously evil assault weapons... Please correct my understandin...

Seems to me they could just require a PTP or PTC for all transfers, universal background covered. But I think they are looking for something more intrusive.

JJ wrote:Stanek for senate?

Didn't Stanek go to Washington to meet with Obama to discuss the need for more gun control, shortly followed by Obama coming to MN to sell the plan?

NMRMN wrote:Also, how would universal background checks be enforced without a "actual" registry?

Undercover stings come to mind, like with underage alcohol purchases.

jshuberg wrote:Owning a firearm is a right.
Voting in an election is an entitlement.

You're making an apples to oranges comparison.

Voting is a verb.
A right is a noun.
Apples and oranges are nouns.

AR wrote:

You want to put a face to the name.

npthaiduong wrote:My intent to use this rifle is for hunting.

Hunting varmits? An AR is not such a good choice for hunting deer.

Texas conceal law takes the printing and the shirt thing into account. One needs more than just knowledge of a gun presence to charge misuse.

Open carry in TX is a threat, apparently, so I see room for subjective interpretation.

greenfarmer wrote:Or, is this entirely possible? And now Obama is trying to take away every gun possible, so we won't have any chance to survive?

Dude, wake up man. The zombies have already taken over our government.

Bought a Nano in Dec. Shot it once. Jammed on third round. Cuts deep groove on edge of brass. It is very heavy duty for a tiny 9mm. It is built on a 40 platform, and the operation may require the power of 40sw to function properly. The recent models come with an extended magazine, a place for pinky ...

Search found 127 matches

Re: 2 teens killed after allegedly breaking into home;

Re: 2 teens killed after allegedly breaking into home;

Re: Re: 2 teens killed after allegedly breaking into home;

Re: Re: 2 teens killed after allegedly breaking into home;

Re: What's wrong with the star trib? I can't believe it!

Re: Re: Process For Buying A Shotgun From FFL in MN

Re: NICS related Question

Re: Re: Big Al Frankin

Re: Re: NICS related Question

Re: Re: Dayton slams NRA's 'bogus' gun arguments

Re: Re: Paymar wants to reintroduce ban on private sales

Re: Re: Which is the first AR to get?

Re: What happens if. . .

Re: Re: Does CDC waste our money? Or is government setting us up

Re: Beretta Nano