Get ready for tomorrow - SF 458 - Latz' bill.

"semiautomatic military-style assault weapon" Those sporting rifles are neither "assault weapons" nor "military style". No bill introduced in ANY STATE should be allowed to use such subjective terminology. (Ever notice they never even mention the caliber?) Being semi au...

There's no such thing as a "semiautomatic military-style assault weapon".
This terminology needs to get eliminated from politics.

Why is it continually allowed to use the phrase, "...... semiautomatic military-style assault weapon", when 1.) "semiautomatic" is NOT! "military style", and 2.) is NOT an assault weapon? That leaves the guns in question so arbitrary? This wordage should not be allowed ...

How can a sheriff defend a law against the feds? They have no jurisdiction in federal law. Plus, what could they possibly do, try to arrest federal agents for enforcing federal laws? Really need to read the fine print on those laws where the Sheriffs won't enforce Fed laws. Like Wyoming, for exampl...

.................keep vigilant and don't let it happen here!
See the article toward the bottom and they nipped it in the bud in one day after discovery:

http://danaloeschradio.com/exclusive-dh ... istration/

1.) If it's a "law", then it's not a "proposal". 2.) Why should ANYTHING be banned? Well, I suppose what we'll see eventually is more laws that propose banning certain weapons and magazines. I'd have to see exactly what they proposed to ban before I could make a choice. I suppose...

Don't know if it's been posted or not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... WLXhahw_A#!

Just wanted to say hey. New, not only to this forum, but to the wilds of Northern Minnesota, as well. I've been following this forum since I arrived from................... (drum roll!).............. Illinois! Yep. Left Illinois to leave the restrictive gun-law state with hopes of getting my carry p...