Since there are laws on the books about how one may lawfully transport firearms in a vehicle without a carry permit, and I don't believe a unsecured firearm immediately accessible to the driver qualifies, then the defendant should have been charged for that. Ruling that the entire interior of a car ...

I'm reminded of the teetotaler who kept a flask "for medicinal purposes".

Let's expand the list of legal justifications for using deadly force to include robbery, burglary and assault.

Are they trying to squeeze in an inspection clause, either explicitly or by interpretation?

Count on it.

No, it shows that legislators don't consider backdoor bans via civil suit legitimate, and that they shouldn't be trying to make gun manufacturers the scapegoat for an out of control criminal subculture.

Sorry to hear it OldmanFCSA

Second Saturday breakfast on the 13th, 9:00 A.M. Gormans in Lake Elmo.

How do you guys bolt down your safes? It's not secure if burglars could just wheel it out on a dolly to crack later at their leisure.

Wed Apr. 3. Usual time and place (11:30 98 Lbs Buffet Bloomington on 98th off of I-35W)

I might not get there until closer to 12:00 (doctors) but I expect to make it.

No I hadn't seen that, but it does underscore my point in a timely fashion.

Can I carry a machete into a voting place?

Actual Marxists are in favor of guns (for them). How else are they going to defend the Revolution against all those counter-revolutionary saboteurs?

We do not, on average, have zero incidents of cannibalism each year. I wasn't aware that infallibility was an achievable goal.

Maybe it all got distributed to advocacy groups.

ashes wrote:Do they even realize that their actions make them King George, Red Coats, and presumptive Royalty?

By everything the modern left stands for, the colonials were wrong to rebel.