lizard55033 wrote:So what are you questioning here?

A faulty shotgun; or the gun demonstrating it?

A faulty shotgun, I HOPE? and the redneck trying to scare people!

http://www.amazon.com/Minnesota-Permit-Firearm-Fundamentals-Edition/dp/1606438093 Reading this book twice taught me more than my PTC class. Many classes use and distribute this book. More should. I probably flip through and refresh my memory on certain sections annually. 49/52 five star reviews. At...

It's been a while since I've been in a 500, but I have seen this problem. As unlikely as it would seem, the bolt carrier can get inserted wrong. The slide will move back and forth but bolt can't lock. If you pull the trigger group you should be able to see the bolt carrier. Next you need to align t...

Live in Morristown. Thinking about running out to Ahlmans but, I took all that off,and screwed something up when putting back together. Not sure what. Followed a youtube video, tearing it down, but, going back together it wasn't REAL clear, so, I think I screwed somethin up. Plus, I'm LH, so that da...

MXGreg wrote:

norman426 wrote:His and Hers

For deer hunting, correct?

Rat Patrol?

Ok I bought this cheap. I removed the foreskin, I mean foestock, and now it doesn't lock when a shell is pumped in. I haven't shot it yet, thank god. But also, I'm a lefty and the pump release is on LH triger side. I don't bump it but the pump will not lock when it is pumped and loaded. Is there som...

+1

Citiot wrote:If it's kin, I'm in.

Otherwise, I am simply going to be a good witness.

+1 Which says what about MN's law, I'd say SUX!

You'd still get illegal discharge of Firearm for that! though. Here is that Fl case which I think is BS! http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/guns/florida-man-fires-warning-shot-gets-20-years-prison-video A Florida man has been sentenced to 20 years in prison after firing a warning shot at a man w...

Yes, agree. At first, I read it quickly, it "seemed" like it was talking about inside a persons dwelling, then reading more slowley, (like I said, IANAL, which is prolly why i read so quickly), I noticed they were two separate, status's + the OR should make it clear also. Duh?

How does this apply: 609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE. The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or ...

In MN when a "defense of another" defense is presented, the duty to retreat and the requirement to be a reluctant participant fall to the person you're defending. That's why it's legally risky to defend someone you don't know, or didn't witness the entirety of the events. If the victim ha...

This IS a pretty good thread, if I say so myself.