xd ED wrote:Where's a 6.5 Grendel when you really need one?

Pretty sure that is what they used.

Huber alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with police to harm the protesters. Rittenhouse said he went to Kenosha from Illinois to help keep order. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: How about holding the city, county and state governments accountable for ordering the pol...

So does Rittenhouse get to counter sue the family for raising a low life scumbag that hit him with a skateboard or no?

Bender wrote::hmm:

IBTL!

Bearcatrp wrote:Give it time, it will get blocked by the courts.

I don't have that much faith in our courts.

Work is looking like it is going to get in the way for me unfortunately.

crbutler wrote:Well, this went downhill in a hurry!

Gravity and an online forum, 2 very strong forces of nature.

They may not think it will reduce crime, but they're certain it will inconvenience gun owners. And the harder you make it to legally own a gun, the fewer gun owners there will be. And always remember - they're goal isn't a world without guns, it's a world without gun owners. Gotta have something to...

Me too.

Incidentally, recently they were in the news in Columbus OH, when ATF director Steve Dettelbach had this to say: “Those weapons are as Congress said unusually dangerous. They're for the military and the government. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves to hear that the modern viewpo...

jdege wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:The ambiguity is quite significant in said document.

If it weren't for the ambiguity it would be far more difficult to engage in the sort of politically-motivated selective prosecution that is the motivation for all of this.

That’s a bingo!

Rowdy Roddy wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:

Rowdy Roddy wrote:That is all you need to do to become compliant.

Really? Glad to hear a lawyer providing free legal advice on the interwebs.

Not a lawyer, but I actually read the document

So did I. As well as several reviews by lawyers. The ambiguity is quite significant in said document.

This is incorrect. A brace can be installed on a rifle with a 16" barrel, according the compliance criteria. Therefore they cannot prosecute you for posessing a brace. They also state in the same criteria that a brace must be rendered inoperable. They are contradicting themselves and that will...

As far as I can tell you're fine if you simply take the brace off. And it may take a few years winding its way through the courts but I'm pretty sure this will eventually be struck down as unconstitutional on one or more grounds. Correct. I think AFT is going to have a hard time in court given thei...

Probably. I will go ahead and get my thong out for this discussion.