I just don't trust our govt to do the right thing You could have stopped right there. We're in complete agreement. :lol: With little exception, since at least Viet Nam, they have directed wars on a weak kneed political basis rather than going in,killing people, breaking things and getting out. That...
Well, if someone keeps blowing up their missles and infecting their systems with viruses, true enough. But the consequences of them getting both the warheads and delivery systems are too dangerous for us and pretty much anyone who doesn't believe in the old guy climbing out of the well. And we woul...
the whole time i was working at Fenway Park it looked like this http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3018/2951686879_87873d41f1.jpg made me sick everyday i had to pass it I remember seeing that billboard as I existed the Boston airport. It was not a welcome introduction to that city.
Since you mentioned it, there are a lot of people who pay little or no taxes. I think they might object to reducing sugar daddy govt. Like the smart wealthy individuals who keep their money offshore because the government will steal a great deal of it if they bring it into the country? Not everybod...
As to his 9-9-9 deal, it sounds good at first with the 9% income tax, no payroll tax (does that include soc Sec?). But then you have to realize that you'll be paying another 9% on everything you buy. If you spend 100% of your income (as most of us must these days), you wind up paying 18% tax. Add i...
The position you outline regarding "noninterventionlism" is soooo Naive and assumes a pre Global Economy mind set. The position you outline regarding "interventionism" is soooo Naive and assumes a validity to the initiation of violence mind set. You're statements also assume a c...
Isolationism is fine if everyone will leave you alone, but that ship has sailed. We are playing in the Global sandbox and with that comes some risks and responsibilities. There is a big difference between being an isolationist and noninterventionist. Paul is the later which makes sense as we should...
The only thing I've found about Herman Cain in regards to the second amendment was an interview around June. Basically he's OK with states restricting the rights of gun owners.
Isn't this what he's always advocated, stealing from the "rich" to give to the "poor?" I guess he's only a fan of wealth redistribution when it's other peoples' wealth being forcefully redistributed.