No. You can either go through a FFL or you can create and retain the record (which does not require going through a FFL) - these are not the same thing. Bryan I am still confused. If you do a transfer though an FFL the FFL will run a background check correct? We now have 2 ways in MN to transfer ha...

Holland&Holland wrote:The link was to last year’s over reach. Is there one for this next session yet?

Session starts next week, we'll have a preview video up soon but we won't know for sure what they are planning until they either drop the bills or announce them.

bryan

The 'Universal Background Check (except for criminals)' makes it illegal to send your guns to a friend without going to an FFL for a background check in both directions. That's not what MN's universal background check law says. details here: https://gunowners.mn/learn/minnesota-laws/ubcs/ But in es...

I personally enjoy watching historian Saul Cornell get his ass handed to him over and over and over in federal 2A cases.

But that's me.
b

Constitutional question: has it ever been argued that two provisions of the constitution are fundamentally in conflict? Because I could see Kalifornia claiming that the entire Second Amendment conflicts with the mandate of the government to establish peace, order and safety. Not that they'd be righ...

Jackpine Savage wrote:The 'Universal Background Check (except for criminals)' makes it illegal to send your guns to a friend without going to an FFL for a background check in both directions.

That's not what MN's universal background check law says.

details here:

https://gunowners.mn/learn/minnesota-laws/ubcs/

We have long argued for better/expanded access to mental health care in Minnesota - generally behind the scenes at the Capitol but it crops up in our testimony as well.

Bryan

Markemp wrote:I’m willing to bet that Trump is going to tell you exactly what you want to hear.

I am unfortunately going to agree with you on this.
b

Why do you think congress banned the CDC and NIH from conducting firearms related research with government funding? For congress to actually pass such an act, it was pretty egregious. But they weren't. They were banned from using government funding to advocate for gun control. They were never barre...

Considering that the Post Office is a private company and not part of the federal government, I don't see how they have been getting away with this claiming that it is federal property. The postal service is an independent agency within the executive branch (See postal act of 1792 and subsequent le...

I don't see this holding up on appeal given that the court called out sensitive places such as government buildings in Bruen, but we'll see what happens when it is appealed.
b

Lumpy wrote:It purports to be from Erich Pratt and Gun Owners of America. However the actual source of the email is GOA@gunownerusa. That isn't those jerks from Iowa is it?

What does the email say?
b

I can assure you that no one at our organization is getting suits made on our donor's dime.

Bryan

Markemp wrote:

bstrawse wrote:For what it's worth, the ACLU of Minnesota submitted written testimony and testified against several gun control bills this past legislative session, including UBCs and Red Flag Gun Confiscation.
b

Wasn't this you earlier?

bstrawse wrote:Except the 2nd amendment.
b

Yes.

For what it's worth, the ACLU of Minnesota submitted written testimony and testified against several gun control bills this past legislative session, including UBCs and Red Flag Gun Confiscation.
b