Seismic Sam wrote:Erud wrote:Seismic,
Every cartridge in the Berger manual is seriously under-powered with their published data. I don't know if their legal department just got a little too excited or what, but I've found their data to be mostly useless. Heck, their max Varget charge for a .308 with 155's is a full 3 grains below what I've used in my last 4 Palma barrels. At any rate, the bad juju with their 300gr .338 offering was back in 2010. Are you suggesting that they have done nothing to correct the design flaw in the past 6+ years, and instead stole your load data and just capped the top end to keep their customers from ever uncovering the conspiracy? As Berger does more bullet testing and development than any company in the industry, that seems a little hard for me to believe. Have you tried calling them to ask them? I'd be pretty darned surprised if they haven't addressed an acknowledged flaw in that amount of time. They didn't get to the top of the bullet mountain by fleecing their customers, and they have a reputation to protect. The hybrid design in general is arguably one of the biggest advancements in bullet design in the last 50 years.
Are you suggesting that they have done nothing to correct the design flaw in the past 6+ years ABSOLUTELY
and instead stole your load data WHICH WAS LYING ON THE GRASSY KNOLL IN DALLAS...
And just capped the top end to keep their customers MONEY COMING IN
From ever uncovering the conspiracy? I SMELL BLACK HELICOPTERS AND BURNING RETUMBO!!! YOW!!!
As Berger does more bullet testing and development than any company in the industry, that seems a little hard for me to believe. THEY TESTED THE BC ONCE, WENT PUBLIC WITH THE DATA AND ADVERTISED THAT BC TO GET QUICK SALES, AND THEN HAD TO RETRACT IT ALL. IN ADDITION, THEY DIDN'T SAY THEIR INITIAL TESTING WAS SCREWED UP,BUT THAT THEY COULDN'T REPRODUCE THE TESTING, WHICH SOMEHOW IMPLIES THAT THE FIRST TEST WAS STILL REAL AND/OR EVER EXISTED. NONE OF THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH A LEADER IN INNOVATION AND PRODUCT TESTING IN THE INDUSTRY.
Here's the original advertised performance of the Berger 338 Hybrrid:
I remember seeing this data and looking at the .933 BC for 2500 - 3000 FPS, and thought this must be the breakthrough of the century to get a BC this high. Back then I think everyone used the G1 numbers, and the nearest competitor was Sierra with their 300 SMK having a BC of .768. .933/.768 = 21% improvement with the Berger bullet That seemed like it was too good to be true......
In addition, I sent at least two letters in to them with my chrono data, and talked to Bryan Litz TWICE on the phone. Never heard a peep back.
Well, if you are right then I'd agree that is pretty sketchy. I sent them an email asking for some clarification on this, will start a new thread if they reply.
Bearcat,
Retumbo with the 300 SMK was definitely the ticket in the one good .338 LM that I owned. The other one was a a total piece of crap that never shot anything well....