Seismic Sam wrote:I still think you should name the company doing the training, as this is a pretty serious safety and MANAGEMENT infraction that could have gotten somebody hurt. They buy crappy re-manufactured ammo from God only knows where, and perhaps the half sober uncle of one of the owners/trainers, and then essentially FORCE unsuspecting new shooters to use this stuff?? That's demonstrable proof they don't know Jack shyte about telling good ammo from bad, and also that they are trying to get by a cheap as possible while they are making a buck off this crap. It's ESPECIALLY hypocritical to say you don't want students to bring handloaded ammo to class, and then it turns out that this cheap crap WAS handloaded by somebody who didn't know enough to use a minimum tolerance die. If this had happened to me, I would make sure that I named this "training" company, because I'd rather burn in hell than take responsibility for someone getting hurt with this crap down the line....
^^THIS^^ in spades. This "class" was a poop show in all aspects, from start to finish. Without question, the training failed in the 2 most important areas, safety and judgement. Not only did they require the use of unsafe ammunition, someone made the uninformed decision to do so, and then risk seriously damaging your wife's property. And imo, that only happened because she was a woman. No way that would've occurred had it been you or I. Refusing to name them puts those of us in the gun community at considerable risk of becoming victim to their low standards of safety and judgement. When dealing with firearms that can lead to serious injury or death.