Heffay wrote: It looks like about 50-60% of the complaints they receive are actually related to wolves though.
I'd say it's more like 50-60% of the complaints are verified by finding a killed cow. That's what "No. Sites" means. The "Complaints Verified" will generally be higher because of multiple kills at one site.
The percentage spread between complaints and verification seems to remain relatively consistent. If there is a widening in the spread it might be attributed to the less rural people making complaints before a kill takes place or missing pets that can't be verified. Or maybe even a growing bias by the data collectors. Or maybe more increased activism by the reporters. Hard to say because the latest data point that looks like a widening is just that - one data point.
Would have been interesting to hear the whole report and not just look at the PowerPoint.
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.