With the other thread, I been lookin' at some videos of the "climbing" stands. On public land, I usually end up having to go in quite a ways, to avoid others ... so weight becomes a paramount issue. At which, I've ended up at Lone Wolf's door, again. I didn't like the looks of the "sit-n-climb" ... so I wrote an email to 'em about it ... and they wrote back right away with an option I hadn't considered ... the "hand-climber" with the optional "sit strap". If I went with the "assault", that'd be 'bout 14 lbs ... and nothing more. $16 fer the "strap" ... 'bout $400 fer the "hand climber" ... maybe a little less.
The Lone Wolf guy called me, to make sure I got his message ... and we talked a bit. After a bit, he figured I'd be better off with the "climbing sticks" ... and my current "hang on" stand. Ordinarily, I'd think "that's worth a try". Except, the sticks are $200/four (which I figure gives me about 16ft off the ground, max.). First off, that seems a bit short, to me (last good spot I had was on an incline ... I had to be up well over 20ft ... good thing I was, too!). Secondly, I'd hate to piss away 'nother $200 on a stand I was already lookin' to "upgrade" from. Thirdly, my "hang on" is 14 lbs and 4 "sticks" is 'nother 11 lbs.

I'm purdy sure I'll go with the "hand-climber" with the "sit strap". Jest curious if anyone's got any strong reasons why that might not be a good idea?