At 25 yards I shoot about a 3" group, I didn't measure groups at longer ranges.farmerj wrote:Considering the average deer kill zone is 9", I'd say get the Hawken.
Why the hawken? Because you'd be more accurate than with a pistol. You can only shoot a 12" group. When you can get it consistently under 9", use the pistol.
can consistently hit 12" target at 25 and 50 yards
farmerj wrote:I didn't read that that way...can consistently hit 12" target at 25 and 50 yards
To me, that means you can't hit a 12" target each time. It might be 8 out of 10 or so.
but if you are shooting 3" groups at 25 yards,
Either would be a good option. Especially if you can get a good amount of hawken practice in this week.
yuppiejr wrote:Any reason you can't take/carry both? I'll always opt for a shoulder fired weapon if given the choice, the .50 caliber muzzleloaders I've used handle along the lines of a 12 gauge break action shotgun chucking slugs with similar sights and vastly superior ballistics over a 4" .357 magnum. That 2" difference in barrel length between your 4" and the 6" you chronoed is significant when you're trying to hit that magic 1000 ft/lbs number for deer, if I look at the average of a spectrum of loads chronoed from BBTI.com I see a 150-200 FPS drop in speed and 150-200 ft/lbs less energy at the muzzle in the batch of .357 stuff which puts you down around 750 ft/lbs at the muzzle... the low BC of those hardcast doesn't help the energy numbers as range increases. Factor in some buck fever and I'd make 25 yards my longest shot and only on a perfect/profile target with the revolver.
grousemaster wrote:yuppiejr wrote:Any reason you can't take/carry both? I'll always opt for a shoulder fired weapon if given the choice, the .50 caliber muzzleloaders I've used handle along the lines of a 12 gauge break action shotgun chucking slugs with similar sights and vastly superior ballistics over a 4" .357 magnum. That 2" difference in barrel length between your 4" and the 6" you chronoed is significant when you're trying to hit that magic 1000 ft/lbs number for deer, if I look at the average of a spectrum of loads chronoed from BBTI.com I see a 150-200 FPS drop in speed and 150-200 ft/lbs less energy at the muzzle in the batch of .357 stuff which puts you down around 750 ft/lbs at the muzzle... the low BC of those hardcast doesn't help the energy numbers as range increases. Factor in some buck fever and I'd make 25 yards my longest shot and only on a perfect/profile target with the revolver.
Nice take. Maybe I'll throw the .357 on my waist and carry the .50
yuppiejr wrote:I like the combo approach and used a revolver along with my Rem700 this year deer hunting up north, not sure weight is much of a factor with the 4" SP101 but with my 7.5" Redhawk and 2 crappy bandolier holsters I got the "buy good leather" religion and picked up a Galco when I got home.Good luck on your hunt!
sgruenhagen44 wrote:Tried the muzzle loader game for a year. Dirty, nasty, less shooting, more cleaning. Use the sp101. By the way I am still jealous you found that gun. They seem to be hard to find. Can only find the 4'' barrel in .22 lr. How about I just trade ya my bow for it and you can use that? Problem solved!!! I guess I don't know if ya have killed with a pistol before or not but I got my first pistol kills this year and it was just as cool as my first bow kill. Not saying black powder is not rewarding...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest