jgalt wrote:
It is "alleged" until proof has been provided. Nothing I have seen or heard about this particular instance proves to me that the bullet came from the range, nor has the range been proven to be at fault by any portion of the legal system. Had the woman been killed, we would still be using the term "allegedly" until such time as the accusation had been proven true. Its really a simple concept and the term was used correctly - no need to get your panties in a bundle.
Hmac wrote:jgalt wrote:
It is "alleged" until proof has been provided. Nothing I have seen or heard about this particular instance proves to me that the bullet came from the range, nor has the range been proven to be at fault by any portion of the legal system. Had the woman been killed, we would still be using the term "allegedly" until such time as the accusation had been proven true. Its really a simple concept and the term was used correctly - no need to get your panties in a bundle.
It would be stupid to stand up publicly and try to make that lady prove she got shot by a careless round from DelTone. Public perception is what matters. Currently, the public perceives that DelTone is unsafe, neighbors are being shot by a bunch of crazy gun nuts, and that perception is the reality that their elected officials are reacting to. Since there is no dispute that DelTone's sloppy administration and paperwork is in violation of their CUP, and since there's no dispute that DelTone's construction and administration violates NRA specs, neither DelTone nor their proponents are in ANY position to take ANY kind of self-righteous attitude. Time to bend over and beg forgiveness.
1911fan wrote:Deltone has been there much longer than the housing around it. Counter sue the city/county for issuing building permits which restricted the use and enjoyment of th members property. Screw kowtowing. Go on the offensive and start ripping people new ones. Only an incompetent booob of a civil employee would issue building permits in the safe zone of a rifle range.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:While we can't prove the bullet that struck the woman came from the Del-Ton-Luth club it's foolish to out of hand discount that it did.
1911fan wrote:Only an incompetent booob of a civil employee...
jgalt wrote:
I haven't seen anyone here - or anyone else, for that matter - say that it could not have come from the range. However, that is an awful long way from having any actionable proof that it did. Without such proof, there is no justification for assuming it did, or for taking any punitive action against the club.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:I would say the only "actionable proof" one would need is the fact that a woman, who is the neighbor of a gun range, was struck in the face by a stray bullet. While we will never know with 100% certainty where the bullet came from the smart money says it came from the shooting range.
IMO, most of the shooting ranges in this area are not as safe as we would like to think. Most were built 40+ years ago in areas where there was little or no development. Encroaching urbanization, inadequate impact berms and the lack of proper buffer zones threaten all these ranges.
1911fan wrote:Here again I return to who allowed people to build in the buffer zones? Any one who allows a home or development in the buffer zone of an existing shooting range is just asking for trouble. The people who buy there, are just as lame brained.
1911fan wrote:
To the response about airports, It has worked. and it continues to work, if you had an existing airport before the houses or residents, in many places.
effendude wrote:WTF? "I'm a new guy here, but this attitude will get every range in the country shut down.
Any of you posers and psuedo SWAT/Commando guys who can justify unsafe behavior because it is fun to shoot fast and run around and pretend to be an expert need to find a gravel pit up north somewhere.
Return to Leagues And Shooting Clubs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests