Snowgun wrote:With all this cost savings and brainpower can we dig some pistol bays?
WORD.
Snowgun wrote:With all this cost savings and brainpower can we dig some pistol bays?
rflshtr wrote:Allow me to introduce myself. I am Al Leirness, and I am the chair of the Construction Review Committee appointed by the OGC Board in late December. We are not able to dig in the ground in any manner that would alter the flow of water over the surface of the ranges because doing so would trigger a review by the So. Washington Co. Watershed district and be cost prohibitive and time delaying. We can drill holes for the steel posts to support the overhead steel and the walls. We also cannot do anything additional beyond what was shown to the city in the plans presented in 2012 without triggering a Conditional Use Permit review and a new building permit. We can do less than was shown on the original plans but not more and nothing in addition to what was shown.
Seismic Sam wrote:Could you please define pistol bays a little more precisely?? There will be 8 -10 shooting positions or bays on the Short Range, with partitions in between. What additional digging will be required for something else, why does it have to be digging, and what kind of shooting are we talking about??
bstrawse wrote:Welcome Petar
B
bstrawse wrote:Snow - I think know what you mean. I also think you'll be pleased with the short range enhancements (many more shooting positions, real overhead cover, etc) that the group has come up with. There will be renderings available, I believe, at the meeting next week.
As you know, I'm primarily a pistol guy - and I'm really happy with what they have come up with for the short range.
Bryan
20mm wrote:Have you ever considered a bullet resistant transparent dome encasing the entire range? It would reduce the sound to almost nothing outside of the range. It would allow natural light in while keeping inclement weather at bay. The chance of a round escaping would also be close to zero.
The construction would also give the range positive media attention with it's futuristic design.
Seismic Sam wrote:20mm wrote:Have you ever considered a bullet resistant transparent dome encasing the entire range? It would reduce the sound to almost nothing outside of the range. It would allow natural light in while keeping inclement weather at bay. The chance of a round escaping would also be close to zero.
The construction would also give the range positive media attention with it's futuristic design.
I know you're joking, but I'll say it anyway. Anything even close to that would get closed down before the ink on the blurprints dried because it would violate the Minnesota Clean Air Act with any sort of enclosed space keeping all the lead and powder gases trapped inside. Plus the snow load issue, which turned the Dumpty Dome inside out on several occasions.
20mm wrote:<snip>
Return to Leagues And Shooting Clubs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests