First and foremost, I would like to thank the membership for attending the April meeting, and approving the range development plan. You have no idea how hard I have worked to make this happen, and up until the 11th hour with some of the BS going on, I thought it might not happen. I think you will be pleased with the results, and it will help a LOT in getting us into better compliance with NRA and thus Minnesota state statutes to keep the range open. I would like to state that while I knew fully about the current shortcomings, it was not my place to say anything, and I wasn't about to go public with information that I wasn't authorized to release. That's Bryan's call as a certified NRA Safety Officer and also Board member, and I trust his judgement on this. So I knew a lot more than I was saying previously, but it's his call and not mine.
I have heard from several people about the meeting, and it sounded like a wowser!! To touch on a couple of issues before I get to my main point, there was a person at the beginning who showed up with handouts trying to derail the whole process and complaining about how alternate designs had not been considered, which at that point was a flat out lie, and I am pissed about this personally. For the record, The Construction Review Committee was tasked with deciding what to do with the current plan, and was NEVER charged with considering all plans. Despite that, we identified a lot of shortcomings in any plan with vertical baffles which would have to be replaced regularly, and even worse, the fact that the load bearing vertical posts for these baffles would get shot up in short order and become structurally compromised, and perhaps collapse on somebody. Going back to this person who is totally hung up on ANY design but the current one, one of his proposed ideas was movable plastic sashes on each shooting table to prevent muzzle rise and thus, IF the system worked 100% of the time, keep bullets on the property. Well, I reviwed this idea, drew out the geometry, and discovered to my horror that the length of the gun was a determining factor in how much the sash had to be pulled down. With a 50" long benchrest rifle, having the sash 3" above the rifle barrel was sufficient. With a 16" Smith 500, however, 3" would allow the bullet a full 10 degrees up of flight and it would be over the trees and out of here. I actually tried firing my Smith 500 with a piece of polycarbonate above it to see if the muzzle blast would fog the plastic, and while it didn't, the recoil from the gun hit the plastic hard enough to rip the front sight off my Smith 500!! Can you imagine somebody coming in two days before hunting season and having something like this rip his front sight off so he couldn't go hunting that year??
Another design was to have big concrete pipes at the 100 to prevent bullet travel upwards, and it was going to take 40' of pipe to do this. The first drawback is that even with sound insulation, people who have shot with them say they are noisy as all hell! But Petar did his usual thorough pricing on such a setup for the 100 to try and placate this person, and the total cost for this "much cheaper" alternate solution was $413,000, which was more than the $386,000 that Petar had calculated for the current design!! Plus those pipes would cover so much ground that we would have runoff issues, and the area near the backstop might turn into a swamp, and we could have a problem with the swamp water leaching lead out of the backstop!! ALL this was done well before the meeting, and this person didn't sway his course to derail the whole process a bit. I know one thing - this person owes me a new sight for my 500 for testing out one of his alternate solutions!!
Now, I loved the whole bit about Tom's dismissal coming up, and I was wondering how it was going to turn out, and I again congratulate you for knowing what is right and what is wrong, and forcing the people on the EC who supported this to take Tom back, and for the record, nobody even told me as a Board member this was going down, and I was AT that meeting, so I have an axe to grind personally myself now. Unfortunately, the same people are still there, and if Tom were to go back he would be subjected to even MORE abuse, because you just can't fix stupid!! I should also note that Petar is pissed becuase now he has a construction project for a club with no GM, which is going to be a PITA. While Tom has a very justifiable legal beef and very good counsel to go with it, suing the whole club is not a solution, so he really can't go that route.
The main message I therefore want to get out to all of you is that this situation came about to some extent as a result of member apathy, and I most certainly was one of the guilty ones who just used the club and didn't participate in the process or come to meetings. Well, I have taken responsibility for my past lazy actions, and you got to see the results at the last meeting.
What is needed NOW are MORE good people to step forward, and run for Board positions, and take back this club from the Kool-Aid drinkers. General qualifications are to know what's right and what wrong, and call a spade a spade, and not put up with any BS or under the table dealings, and stand up for the club and do the right thing to keep improving the level of Club Safety to get everything up to NRA specs, while at the SAME time being fiscally responsible and not spending the club's money without due consideration AND membership approval!! So here are the positions you can start considering, and getting organized among yourselves:
Vice President: This position HAS to be filled by a new person more than any other, but apart from that, simply being a club member with some solid history with the club and doing what's right, that about it for qualifications. The old VP Pat is still very much around, and Al Lierness would be an EXCELLENT choice in my book.
Secretary: Somebody who can take near perfect notes, AND who knws right from wrong AND is willing to say something about it!!
Treasurer: Here you will need somebody who is almost a full fledged bookeeper or CPA and has a sense of caution and the ability to plan ahead and be fiscally responsible, and also stand up for what is right and make sure the membership knows what is going on.
Other positions I won't go into: You know who the board was last year, and you know who is still left over, and you can make your own informed decisions about who should stay and who should go. Some may have not had the will to stand up for what's right for the club, and some may have hidden agendas to force the club into default and make the land available for sale at a few pennies on the dollar, and some may have not cared or just gone along for the ride. It's hard to sort all that out, but in the end I have faith in the general membership of the club being a very diverse and fairly well educated group, and so again I would ask to to start organizing and getting ready for the elections this Fall. Start NOW, and keep working on it, and talking among yourselves and gathering support and concensus for people YOU want to see running this club.