![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
If she is one of the instructors for his class I will sign up in a New York minute!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
rtk
macphisto wrote:If I win the lottery (which I don't play) AND start reloading on a progressive press in the next couple months, I'll be there!
Einthoven's Triangle wrote:I can see the reasoning to having a factory ammo requirement, but good reloading practices can produce quality ammo.
At the range, virtually every time I see someone having Feeding/Extracting/Ejecting problems, they are using reloads. I'm sure that good quality reloads can be made, but a lot of people seem to try to get by with cheap* and easy instead. I suspect that the schools got tired of the disruption caused by people with mediocre ammo, and tried to eliminate that variable.JoeH wrote:I agree 100%. However, in browsing many training web sites, I quite often see factory ammo as a requirement.Einthoven's Triangle wrote:I can see the reasoning to having a factory ammo requirement, but good reloading practices can produce quality ammo.
Ironbear wrote:At the range, virtually every time I see someone having Feeding/Extracting/Ejecting problems, they are using 1911s.
Fast351 wrote:Ironbear wrote:At the range, virtually every time I see someone having Feeding/Extracting/Ejecting problems, they are using 1911s.
Fixed it for ya....![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests