Tabsr wrote:Anybody that believes Obama or Hillary will support you Bill of Rights are delusional.
1911fan wrote:Again, so McCain is slight to the left of your position, Do you believe that any the DNC can put forward is better than McCain?
Does anyone here think that voting for Hillary or bambam is a good thing.
Remember your vote does matter, The First W win was by a hand full of votes, and not just in florida. He won florida by just 327 confirmed votes. Just coincidentally, we have 343 Votes on this forum.
Gore won New mexico by less than 400 votes, W won and lost several states by 2 thousand or so vote either way.
justaguy wrote:
I don’t think anyone would vote for the Dems. I think we are talking about write ins. I think at least for me maybe.
No, it is a vote for my conservative candidate and not a liberal RINO.a Write in IS a vote for the opposition.
1911fan wrote:Voting 3rd party may seem like a power vote, but its a lost vote, its not listened to unless you can that number in the polls up to 28-20 percent, and give people the idea that it might work. (Look at Jesse's numbers as evidence to this.
1911fan wrote:I disagree,
A write in vote is a protest vote in all but a very few cases.
A write in for Ron Paul or Fred Thompson is a vote in the general election is a vote for Billary/bambam.
The straw poll of activists at the 35th annual Conservative Political Action Conference showed resistance to Mr. McCain remains strong among conservatives and did not change much with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's suspension of his campaign Thursday.
Before Mr. Romney dropped out, 14 percent said they would not vote, 22 percent said they would vote for someone else and 62 percent said they would back Mr. McCain. After the Romney announcement, 10 percent said they would not vote, 19 percent said they would vote for someone else and 70 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain...
...Issues matter more to Mr. Romney's backers than Mr. McCain's, said Mr. Fabrizio, noting that 63 percent of Romney supporters said a presidential candidate's position on issues mattered most in deciding on whom to vote for, compared with only 42 percent of Mr. McCain's supporters who said that...
...On successive days, featured speakers former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and syndicated columnists Robert Novak and George F. Will cited that commitment to principles first. Each gave reasons for supporting Mr. McCain, the probable GOP presidential nominee, despite his former opposition to President Bush's tax cuts and his support of campaign-finance restrictions, an immigration bill widely derided as amnesty, the proposed Law of the Sea Treaty and a sweeping measure against global warming.
A reason cited often by many speakers was that the next president will almost surely get to name several Supreme Court justices along with hundreds of lower-level federal judges. But Massachusetts Republican state committee member Bob Semonian said Mr. McCain was unreliable on the issue, calling it "important to note [former New Hampshire Sen.] Warren Rudman was McCain's national campaign chairman in 2000 and the chief sponsor for David Souter's appointment to the Supreme Court."
hammAR wrote:
Go drink your own damned Kool-Aid........................Klinton/Osamabama here we come!
princewally wrote:Shouldn't the blame be getting placed on the non-conservative candidates and their counterparts in the GOP leadership? If they offer us crap, and push the crap on us, instead of promoting the actual conservatives, can't we blame them for screwing up the entire situation?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests