DeanC wrote:rugersol wrote:I gotta ask ... why are you so hell-bent on discrediting the NRA?
I already told you before - I have 2 memberships.
You love the NRA so much, why don't you marry them?
Where were they when we should have been commenting on this proposed rule change?
So 'cause you supposedly have "2 memberships", you can trash-talk 'em all ya want, and no one else can question yer allegiance?
I took the liberty of editing out your juvenile comment.
What "rule change" is it you think we should be commenting on? ... and where exactly should the NRA be, whilst we do?
here's the rest of what I wrote, that you neglected to answer ...
rugersol wrote:DeanC wrote:Rev. Dead Corpse wrote:Apparently, the NRA thinks this is worth spending money on a lawsuit on...
Always late to the party. Sort of like Heller.
So they're either "always late" ... or they "raise the alarm" too early or often?
Ever occur to you that some of this stuff don't "pan out" 'cause they DID "raise the alarm" early and often?
Would it make you feel better if the rest of us canceled out memberships?
Is there some other organization we should be donating to?
We've obviously made tremendous strides in recent years ... you seem to suggest the NRA's had absolutely nothing to do with any of it? Who, then?!
You seem to be claiming the NRA's full of ****? But all you have to support that is claims that they haven't actually helped us ... and you haven't named the Pro-Gun Fairy otherwise responsible?
You claim their "alarms" don't pan out? ... isn't that the point of raising an alarm?
I don't think the NRA's the one that's full of ****!
Do you have any kind of evidence, whatsoever ... a paper-trail? ... suggesting anyone with the NRA is knowingly misrepresenting the facts, in some sort of conspiracy to scare people into donating more money?
'Til you do, maybe ya'd have better luck with yer rhetoric on a different forum ... like MnAntiGunTalk?