Ron Paul Naysayers. Put this in your chamber and fire it!

View · by **goett047** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:23 pm

Pat Cannon wrote:Frankly, if the only candidate who's against the war on "terror", and the war on drugs, it turns out, actually IS a racist, or used to hang out with racists, I'm strongly inclined to to write his name in anyway.

Guess who's also a racist...everyone who voted against Obama.

View · by **illbits** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 4:29 pm

He must be a racist! He doesn't want to bomb the brown people of the world! He wants to pardon people convicted of non-violent drug offenses and end the racist war on drugs. He has more support from minorities then any other republican candidates. DEFINITELY sounds like a racist to me.

It's funny that this newsletter is the only dirt that they can find on him and the establishment wants to use it to invalidate his candidacy. The other candidates are so corrupt that people's minds go numb when they hear the laundry list of evil **** they have done. But as long as they represent the status quo they are good to go! Never mind that the policies they advocate are blatantly racist.

It's disgusting to see him in a contest with such pigs as if there is even a comparison.

View · by **Squib Joe** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:15 pm

I was interested in what Ron Paul had to say, especially his drug policy. Sort of dropped off my radar when I read his views on the theory of evolution. Maybe it isn't a big deal but it bugs me.

View · by **goett047** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:18 pm

Squib Joe wrote:I was interested in what Ron Paul had to say, especially his drug policy. Sort of dropped off my radar when I read his views on the theory of evolution. Maybe it isn't a big deal but it bugs me.

What are his views? Does it affect his ability to run a country?

View · by **Squib Joe** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:24 pm

He has stated he doesn't believe in the theory of evolution

goett047 wrote:Does it affect his ability to run a country?

There are a large number of educational and scientific policies that would be affected by this, and I had a diminished sense of his intelligence after learning about it. Those are important things.

View · by **illbits** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:26 pm

Squib Joe wrote:I was interested in what Ron Paul had to say, especially his drug policy. Sort of dropped off my radar when I read his views on the theory of evolution. Maybe it isn't a big deal but it bugs me.

We can't all agree on everything. But at the end of the day science is as faith based as religion. I don't believe either of them myself. But hopefully Ron Paul's voting record and message of liberty will convince you to take another look. If we didn't vote for anyone that didn't share all of our beliefs then we wouldn't vote for anyone but ourselves.

View · by **Squib Joe** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:28 pm

illbits wrote:If we didn't vote for anyone that didn't share all of our beliefs then we wouldn't vote for anyone but ourselves.

Very true

View · by **Pat Cannon** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:32 pm

Squib Joe wrote:He has stated he doesn't believe in the theory of evolution
goett047 wrote:Does it affect his ability to run a country?

There are a large number of educational and scientific policies that would be affected by this, and I had a diminished sense of his intelligence after learning about it. Those are important things.

I gotta say I kinda agree with Joe here. Sigh. One more reason he should balance the ticket with Al Franken.

View · by **illbits** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:34 pm

Squib Joe wrote:He has stated he doesn't believe in the theory of evolution

goett047 wrote:Does it affect his ability to run a country?

There are a large number of educational and scientific policies that would be affected by this, and I had a diminished sense of his intelligence after learning about it. Those are important things.

If those issues are more important to you then fiscal responsibility, non-interventionism, and personal liberty then he may not be the candidate for you. That said you can expect business as usual if any other candidate gets elected. That means more wars, more poverty, and more police state.

View · by **chudrockz** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:48 pm

Ron Paul is devoutly Christian (as opposed to most politicians, who are photo-op Christians). I'm an atheist, and I'll be supporting him 100% until he's elected President next November.

Freedom brings people together, goverment force drives people apart.

View · by **infidel** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:02 pm

Maybe the racism is not an issue. How about the fact he keeps flipping about whether the "alleged" racist words that appeared under his publication, sometimes under his byline, were his or not. Shall we ignore his support for trutherism? How about the fact he would not support an ally? Maybe we should talk about his pandering to fringe groups? Or the rabid support of his supporters ignoring facts? Anybody that thinks we are the cause of 9/11, has a major screw loose and will not win majority support in a general election this cycle.

View · by **goett047** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:27 pm

If we weren't the cause of 9/11 who was?

View · by **Squib Joe** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:30 pm

View · by **mrp** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:53 pm

illbits wrote:But at the end of the day science is as faith based as religion.

You're trolling, right? Right?

View · by **goett047** on Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:09 pm

mrp wrote:
illbits wrote:But at the end of the day science is as faith based as religion.

You're trolling, right? Right?

If one looks at certain aspects if "science" they're really not that believable without faith