DitchDR wrote:Looks like LaPierre is onto something,
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12 ... snhp&pos=1"The National Rifle Association’s call to put armed guards in every public school in America has even further intensified the debate over how to protect the nation’s children in class, with some districts saying they’re preparing to take just that action and other educators cautioning that doing so sends the wrong message about education."
"If it requires to put armed individuals in our schools to protect our kids, then we need to do that," Scarnati told NBC station WJAC of Johnstown.
But that idea doesn't sit well with other educators, like Tony Scott, superintendent of schools in Bellaire, Ohio, where a local firearms association said it would provide free shooting training to teachers after the Connecticut shootings.
"I just don't believe our teachers signed up for this," Scott told NBC station WTOV of Steubenville, Ohio. "I know I didn't sign up for it."
...this is really what it all boils down to! ...few people abhor guns, like teachers... without giving it a seconds thought, they'd much rather attempt to use their own bodies as a very ****ty bullet deflector!
If not fer them, there'd be armed security in every school!... if not fer their unions, and their bloated staff, there'd be money to pay fer it too!
... simple bigotry, and irresponsible money handling!... almost as if they'd pulled the trigger themselves!
