Have you SEEN what they're about to pass in NY?!!

View · by **AgAuTHORITY** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:11 am

Rest of the country might need them 10 rounders, if things keep going south.

View · by **xd9** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:20 am

Or we might all have the 7 round limit... :roll:

View · by **rugersol** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:25 am

I'm sure it has absolutely nothing at all to do with logic or reason ... but I can't help but wonder, how they arrived at "7"?!

Anyhow ... I wonder what the ruling on this'd be?! ... 8rd .357

... they probly have no clue, such a thing exists! ... let's hope none of 'em ever comes across Jerry Miculek on youtube!

View · by **Thunder71** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:48 am

I wonder if anyone in New York has a BK-25 magazine they'd like to sell? I don't feel bad asking, they got what they voted for... Granted I doubt many on Armslist actually voted for him.

View · by **Heffay** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:49 am

rugersol wrote:Anyhow ... I wonder what the ruling on this'd be?! ... 8rd .357

I'm trying to find the magazine in that pic, but not having any luck. Can you help me out please?

View · by **rugersol** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:55 am

Heffay wrote:I'm trying to find the magazine in that pic, but not having any luck. Can you help me out please?

View · by **2in2out** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:06 am

goett047 wrote:This should be interesting...what is that word "infringe" again?

What coolaid could possibly be that powerful????? That's the craziest legislative flatulence I've ever smelled.

The more outrageous the law is, I think the better it will eventually work in our favor - the sooner this can get struck down by the courts as unconstitutional, the better.

View · by **Holland&Holland** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:14 am

Thunder71 wrote:I wonder if anyone in New York has a BK-25 magazine they'd like to sell? I don't feel bad asking, they got what they voted for... Granted I doubt many on Armslist actually voted for him.

Current (now previous I guess) restriction was 10 rounds so if they did they are likely still gonna keep it.

View · by **whiteox** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:16 am

2in2out wrote:
goett047 wrote:This should be interesting...what is that word "infringe" again?

What coolaid could possibly be that powerful????? That's the craziest legislative flatulence I've ever smelled.

The more outrageous the law is, I think the better it will eventually work in our favor - the sooner this can get struck down by the courts as unconstitutional, the better.

That is about the only good thing I can see about this. I'd love to be a fly on the wall of Justice Scalia's chambers this morning.

View · by **Thunder71** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:16 am

1994 pre-ban, not confiscated... this time they must get rid of them.

View · by **rugersol** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:19 am

2in2out wrote:the sooner this can get struck down by the courts as unconstitutional, the better.

... way I understood it was, the "courts" ruled that the 2nd Amendment is for "self-defense" ... moreover, that the states "should" regulate guns ... I see this goin' nowhere 'sept thru 5rd J-frame revolvers ... 2rd derringers, and eventually stun-guns, and pepper-spray!

View · by **BigJnMn** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:30 am

Wow man. That just sucks. Not cool. Sucks to be a New Yorker! Am I right? Those poor bastards. Serves them right though for voting those idiots into office. NY has been a lost cause for a long time. Same with NJ and CA and CT will be next.

Mmmmm.......know what's interesting though about NY? They pretty much have one county (it's really the four largest boroughs that make up what everyone outside of New York calls New York city - which, if not confusing enough, sits atop four counties) that control that state. Doesn't matter what the other rural counties do or how they vote because that area makes up about half the states population. It's very similar to Minnesota and Hennepin county. One county pretty much throws all the others around however it wants. Being that Minnesota is a progressive state that will always be either blue or purple, but never red, I'm thinking that we are in a precarious situation.

Oh, and I'm not an ass. My stomach turned last night when that bill passed and I was filled with contempt at the politicians that would treat those who wish to partake in their RIGHT of the Second Amendment as criminals.

It reminds me of the story about the frog and the boiling water. We are not going to wake up one day to find that we have to turn in all of our weapons. We will have been giving them up piece by piece for awhile until they are just gone. The guns can dry up in this country given enough time and laws and Executive Orders. Given enough mass shootings and enough intentional neglect to the real issues it is entirely possible that we will be alive to see it happen.

There is little that we can do right now other than pay attention to what happens next. The other shoe has yet to drop. If you want to keep the 2A intact you need to become an activist for it and not just post in gun forums - not saying that's all everyone is doing. The NRA is not your only option. There are other national Second Amendment organizations that you can support. Find out what companies and products are anti-2A and stop supporting them. When you vote, don't skip those judges. Educate yourself on their record. Most of these anti-2A laws will go before the State courts.

Alright, rant off.

View · by **BigJnMn** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:37 am

One more small item and then the rant will be off.

http://www.saf.org

This group is, by far, leading the charge.

View · by **Rip Van Winkle** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:17 am

Heffay wrote:
rugersol wrote:Anyhow ... I wonder what the ruling on this'd be?! ... 8rd .357

I'm trying to find the magazine in that pic, but not having any luck. Can you help me out please?

The gun may or may not still be legal, but the speed loaders defiantly won't be.

View · by **PHATSPEED7x** on Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:56 am

Yep. It's nuts. Let's home our state don't get that way...