Nalez wrote:jshuberg wrote:I joined the video feed late, is tonight magazine ban and loss of preemption?
Looks like tonight is going to be:
HF307 (Simonson) Permit to carry application required to be made to a chief of police of a municipality, and if no chief of police, to a county sheriff.
HF242 (Hausman) Large-capacity magazine crime established for the manufacture, transfer, or possession of ammunition feeding devices with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds or any conversion kit, part, or combination of parts; terms defined; and criminal penalties provided.
I think we need all the support we can get for HF242. I find it a bit odd that my bolt action .22 rifle with a 15 round mag is a threat to public safety....
Dante wrote:A convenience for you could potentially be a big issue for others... I am very happy that my Chief has nothing to do or say about it currently. I would hate to think what might happen if he did.
tabberski wrote:What is tonight's Hearing about
BigBlue wrote:Dante wrote:A convenience for you could potentially be a big issue for others... I am very happy that my Chief has nothing to do or say about it currently. I would hate to think what might happen if he did.
Doesn't the bill merely change the 'who', not the 'how'? It would still be shall-issue. I'm not saying I'm for it or against it, since I haven't heard many pros & cons yet. But if the worry is about your local chief being able to arbitrarily deny you I think that worry is no more significant than it is today with the sheriff.
BB
Dante wrote:A convenience for you could potentially be a big issue for others... I am very happy that my Chief has nothing to do or say about it currently. I would hate to think what might happen if he did.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests