
AR wrote:goalie wrote:
The reason the original carry law in MN was unconstitutional is the same reason the government cannot now add gun control onto other unrelated bills.
It WAS passed in an unconstitutional manner. It was fixed and passed correctly. The system worked.
I'm going to defer to the 'GOCRA HISTORIANS' You are right about a DNR bill being....'commander-ed' and the MPPA 2003 became that bill...I seriously think it was well within the scope of 'judgment call' as to wether 'the title of the bill described the bill'.
In other words, from my knowledge, transforming the DNR bill into the MPPA 2003 was nothing that hadn't been done routinely by the DFL.
The Church parking lot / signage issue AFIK is the only reason the bill got to court anyway and THAT SUIT was just pure political fighting done with the court as the battlefield.
That's how I got it.
AR wrote:This just in:
NY State Supreme Court to Cuomo:
PROVE 'Safe' act is constitutional by April 29 or an injunction will be issued preventing enforcement.
So...bill will be suspended pending court challenges HA HA HA.
Good News. I hope they're listening in ST. Paul
Heffay wrote:AR wrote:This just in:
NY State Supreme Court to Cuomo:
PROVE 'Safe' act is constitutional by April 29 or an injunction will be issued preventing enforcement.
So...bill will be suspended pending court challenges HA HA HA.
Good News. I hope they're listening in ST. Paul
Anyone who didn't see this coming hasn't been paying attention.
Heffay wrote:AR wrote:This just in:
NY State Supreme Court to Cuomo:
PROVE 'Safe' act is constitutional by April 29 or an injunction will be issued preventing enforcement.
So...bill will be suspended pending court challenges HA HA HA.
Good News. I hope they're listening in ST. Paul
Anyone who didn't see this coming hasn't been paying attention.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests