St. Olaf wrote:You do realize that all your link says is that the CRA contributed to riskier loans by banks.
That's the full extent of it.
It makes no difference what crap they came up with because it
doesn't even address your first argument at all.I've been waiting and waiting for you to figure this out......and you have not shown any sign of the light breaking through.
You've got to be the funniest and most confused poster this week. I'm nominating you for my hall of fame.

You have a hall of fame for people that point out your lack of brain power? I bet it's long, even though you only have a couple hundred posts.
So you did read the study? Thought you said you wouldn't. What about it is B.S.? What is my "original argument" you are referring to?
You're almost like one of those callers that call in for talk show hosts to make an idiot out of, I don't believe you really believe what you're saying. You have not used any sources to back up any of your claims about political affiliations or personal wealth of the board members you accused of publishing false reports, and covering for the Bush administration.
You have provided no sources of you're own to back up any of your ideas, and you have the debate skills of a 6 year old.