Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Firearms related political discussion forum

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby MNIceMan on Thu May 09, 2013 11:13 am

Heffay wrote:
MNIceMan wrote:Ther will be many safes purchased by non-gun owners unless there is a means to prove you own a firearm.


Why would a non gun owner purchase a gun safe?

A safe is a safe as a safe is.
MN DNR FAS Instructor
NRA Life Member
"We all have our own Green Mile to walk. How will yours be?"
User avatar
MNIceMan
 
Posts: 417 [View]
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:14 pm
Location: SW Metro

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby yuppiejr on Thu May 09, 2013 12:21 pm

Before people get excited, a tax DEDUCTION is what's being proposed... not a credit:

"The Secure Firearms Act will provide up to a $1,200 federal income tax deduction for the purchase of a gun safe, or other safety devices, through Dec. 21, 2014."

Which means you are reducing your tax obligation (assuming you itemize) by up to $1,200 along with your other deductions (mortgage interest, IRA contributions, etc..).

Rate Single Filers Married Joint Filers Head of Household Filers
10% $0 to $8,925 $0 to $17,850 $0 to $12,750
15% $8,925 to $36,250 $17,850 to $72,500 $12,750 to $48,600
25% $36,250 to $87,850 $72,500 to $146,400 $48,600 to $125,450
28% $87,850 to $183,250 $146,400 to $223,050 $125,450 to $203,150
33% $183,250 to $398,350 $223,050 to $398,350 $203,150 to $398,350
35% $398,350 to $400,000 $398,350 to $450,000 $398,350 to $425,000
39.6% $400,000 and up $450,000 and up $425,000 and up

So those folks in the median income range for the state would effectively see %15 of $1,200 ($180) if they took the full deduction, $300 for those the next bracket up, etc... Note that since this is a FEDERAL program it may not be mirrored in your state tax obligation since they don't necessarily have to provide the same deduction. It's a far cry from the $3500-$4500 vehicle purchase credit that went along with the 2009 CARS program.
User avatar
yuppiejr
 
Posts: 2853 [View]
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:01 pm
Location: Blaine, MN

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Thunder71 on Thu May 09, 2013 12:25 pm

Yep, exactly. It seemed some were thinking they got up to $1500 back... not even close.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby LarryFlew on Thu May 09, 2013 12:42 pm

Heffay wrote:
MNIceMan wrote:Ther will be many safes purchased by non-gun owners unless there is a means to prove you own a firearm.


Why would a non gun owner purchase a gun safe?


So they can sell it to a gun owner for a profit. Assuming they will not tell uncle sam they sold it.
If you're having second thoughts you're two ahead of most Democrats
User avatar
LarryFlew
 
Posts: 5145 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Hamburg, MN - CZ fan - Class of 66 - USAF 66-70 - NRA life since 1970

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby liferefugee on Thu May 09, 2013 12:46 pm

I have had my eye on a little safe for ammo storage. This would be a great reason to purchase it, not that I really need an excuse, more like a little extra incentive for the budget committee (wife).
liferefugee
 
Posts: 57 [View]
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 7:42 am

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby ex-LT on Thu May 09, 2013 12:51 pm

Heffay wrote:
MNIceMan wrote:Ther will be many safes purchased by non-gun owners unless there is a means to prove you own a firearm.


Why would a non gun owner purchase a gun safe?

Do you only put guns in your gun safe? In addition to guns, I have important papers (will, insurance documents, jewelry appraisals, title abstract, previous year tax returns and associated documentation, etc) in mine.
DNR Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Instructor - Pistol, Rifle, and Shotgun
NRA Endowment Life Member
MN Gun Owners Caucus Life Member
Member Post 435 Gun Club
User avatar
ex-LT
Inspector Gadget
 
Posts: 3488 [View]
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Lakeville

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Lights on Thu May 09, 2013 1:12 pm

Heffay wrote:
MNIceMan wrote:Ther will be many safes purchased by non-gun owners unless there is a means to prove you own a firearm.


Why would a non gun owner purchase a gun safe?


To put your important papers and valuables in might be one reason.
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified RSO
User avatar
Lights
 
Posts: 366 [View]
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: Hastings, MN

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Heffay on Thu May 09, 2013 1:18 pm

ex-LT wrote:
Heffay wrote:
MNIceMan wrote:Ther will be many safes purchased by non-gun owners unless there is a means to prove you own a firearm.


Why would a non gun owner purchase a gun safe?

Do you only put guns in your gun safe? In addition to guns, I have important papers (will, insurance documents, jewelry appraisals, title abstract, previous year tax returns and associated documentation, etc) in mine.


I don't have a gun safe (or any safe for that matter). Well, a small locker under my desk for my Glock. But if this passes, I'm going out and getting myself the biggest honkin' safe I can fit through the door!

Otherwise they just stay in the closet.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Mn01r6 on Thu May 09, 2013 1:25 pm

Heffay wrote:I don't have a gun safe (or any safe for that matter). Well, a small locker under my desk for my Glock. But if this passes, I'm going out and getting myself the biggest honkin' safe I can fit through the door!

Otherwise they just stay in the closet.


$1,200 doesn't buy you much of a safe, and assuming median income, you will only save a few hundred bucks. It's pretty much like waiting for your chosen safe to go on sale, except you have to wait until you file next year's taxes to get the "sale" price.
User avatar
Mn01r6
 
Posts: 1233 [View]
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:01 pm
Location: Playing Devil's Advocate

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Heffay on Thu May 09, 2013 1:31 pm

Mn01r6 wrote:$1,200 doesn't buy you much of a safe, and assuming median income, you will only save a few hundred bucks. It's pretty much like waiting for your chosen safe to go on sale, except you have to wait until you file next year's taxes to get the "sale" price.


Now I can take advantage of a sale price AND gin up a fake receipt to get credit for the full value!

Only suckers pay retail. ;-)
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby xd ED on Thu May 09, 2013 1:36 pm

Mn01r6 wrote:This will be cash for clunkers part II - a complete waste of tax dollars and perversion of the free market. This MIGHT lead to 10% more safes being sold, but with increased demand will come increased prices, nullifying the tax incentive or possibly even making the safes cost the consumer more than if no tax break existed. I am sick of supply shortages in the firearms market and this will just trigger another one.


Alll of the above, plus, you just got in bed with those advocating subsidies for windmills, solar panels, organic food, and whatever else makes just one child safer. Enjoy your troughmates.
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9216 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby AR-15collector on Thu May 09, 2013 1:40 pm

Mn01r6 wrote:This will be cash for clunkers part II - a complete waste of tax dollars


What!?!?!? You actually expect the government to be efficient?
User avatar
AR-15collector
 
Posts: 187 [View]
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:31 pm
Location: West of Grove East of Monti

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Icmgwot on Thu May 09, 2013 3:44 pm

xd ED wrote:Alll of the above, plus, you just got in bed with those advocating subsidies for windmills, solar panels, organic food, and whatever else makes just one child safer. Enjoy your troughmates.
Seriously, this. After all the small government griping I've seen on here, I'm horrified to see people get behind this.

I take it the objections to all the other government waste was that you guys simply weren't receiving any of it?
Icmgwot
 
Posts: 42 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 5:44 pm

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Ron Burgundy on Thu May 09, 2013 4:35 pm

yuppiejr wrote:Before people get excited, a tax DEDUCTION is what's being proposed... not a credit:

"The Secure Firearms Act will provide up to a $1,200 federal income tax deduction for the purchase of a gun safe, or other safety devices, through Dec. 21, 2014."

Which means you are reducing your tax obligation (assuming you itemize) by up to $1,200 along with your other deductions (mortgage interest, IRA contributions, etc..).

Rate Single Filers Married Joint Filers Head of Household Filers
10% $0 to $8,925 $0 to $17,850 $0 to $12,750
15% $8,925 to $36,250 $17,850 to $72,500 $12,750 to $48,600
25% $36,250 to $87,850 $72,500 to $146,400 $48,600 to $125,450
28% $87,850 to $183,250 $146,400 to $223,050 $125,450 to $203,150
33% $183,250 to $398,350 $223,050 to $398,350 $203,150 to $398,350
35% $398,350 to $400,000 $398,350 to $450,000 $398,350 to $425,000
39.6% $400,000 and up $450,000 and up $425,000 and up

So those folks in the median income range for the state would effectively see %15 of $1,200 ($180) if they took the full deduction, $300 for those the next bracket up, etc... Note that since this is a FEDERAL program it may not be mirrored in your state tax obligation since they don't necessarily have to provide the same deduction. It's a far cry from the $3500-$4500 vehicle purchase credit that went along with the 2009 CARS program.

^^^^^this. Deduction does not equal credit, folks. Well done :bravo:
User avatar
Ron Burgundy
 
Posts: 981 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:28 pm

Re: Secure Firearms Act Proposed

Postby Heffay on Thu May 09, 2013 5:26 pm

I thought we were for lower taxes? Why can't people around here maintain some sort of consistency? You know how tiring it is to try to keep up?
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron