I see it a bit differently...
They are a public building vs a private property.
Government is different in two ways. First, that they can require me to enter the business, and second that their using my tax money to pay for it.
642rUS wrote:Government is different in two ways. First, that they can require me to enter the business, and second that their using my tax money to pay for it.
This is exactly why the MCPPA expressly prohibits political subdivisions from "limit[ing] the exercise of a permit to carry."
471.633 removes any POWER from the city and makes any ordinance "void" while 624.714 re-emphisizes that a city has NO AUTHORITY to "limit" the scope of a carry permit.
Good afternoon Mr. JJ,
Senator Brown looked into the issue brought up in your email and article. Non-partisan Senate Counsel sent him information that he wanted passed on to you.
According to Senate Counsel, state law already preempts local units of government on this issue, so they are acting out of line with the statutes. In their opinion, passing another law would probably not be effective since these cities are already flouting the law. It would take an enforcement action (like a lawsuit) to bring them back into compliance.
I hope this information is helpful, but if you need anything else, please let me know and the senator or I will be happy to get back to you.
Have a good evening,
Kacie
Kacie Petersen
Legislative Assistant to Senator Benson
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests