Lumpy wrote:Another local caucus meeting Sat 4-12 before the R. state convention in May. Ortman for senate, but who has the best pro-2nd record for governor or representative?
jgalt wrote:Why not endorse pre-convention? And I do mean both (or all) parties. Is it logistical issues having to do with too many candidates to vett?
Post convention, isn't it a bit late to do much to effect the outcome? Let's face it - a very large number of voters stick with their favorite party almost regardless of that party's nominee, so the only way to truly have an affect is to influence who gets nominated.
I'm not suggesting GOPAC is doing anything wrong, and I'm sure there are legitimate reasons for only endorsing post-convention. I'm just curious about what those reasons are...
Thanks for the work you guys are doing!
Except for the infamous McFadden. That's what I'm trying to avoid at the caucus level, endorsing a wolf in sheep's clothing.bstrawse wrote: The Republicans down the line are all quite strong on 2A with minimal, if any, differences.
b
Lumpy wrote:Except for the infamous McFadden. That's what I'm trying to avoid at the caucus level, endorsing a wolf in sheep's clothing.bstrawse wrote: The Republicans down the line are all quite strong on 2A with minimal, if any, differences.
b
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests