SCOTUS denied every pending Second Amendment cert petition.

[mrp]

https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2020/06/sc ... f-6-15-20/

>Wow – big news out of the Supreme Court’s order list this morning. The Court denied *every* pending Second Amendment cert petition.

[LarryFlew]

Couldn't believe it when I read it, Even the couple real trampled rights where not heard. Draconian need a reason to carry laws etc need to be heard.

[LarryP]

Is this good or bad?

[LarryFlew]

IMO very bad letting the libs make their own rules regarding who can buy what and having to have a reason to get a carry permit.

[Jackpine Savage]

It means Roberts has no balls. We need Trump to replace Ginsberg. Then be ready for CW II.

[Ghost]

It means Roberts has no balls. We need Trump to replace Ginsberg. Then be ready for CW II.

They had the 4 votes needed, it may mean they didn’t have the 5th vote that would have mattered.

[atomic41]

They have been turning these down for weeks. There are something like 20 cases, they keep denying them. Once a case is heard, it will strengthen 2A, which is why they keep getting punted.

[Holland&Holland]

Infringers be infringing dog.

[GoodDoctor]

It means Roberts has no balls. We need Trump to replace Ginsberg. Then be ready for CW II.

They had the 4 votes needed, it may mean they didn’t have the 5th vote that would have mattered.

These rejections may be more insidious than what it appears. I couldn't find the actual rule to verify this (been out of the law game for 17 years, and didn't practice before the Supreme Court anyway), but my memory from law school was that only four votes were needed to accept a cert petition. Which would imply that at least one of the four more conservative justices did not vote in favor. Hopefully, someone on the forum can enlighten us further.

[atomic41]

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/gun-i ... -2a-cases/

[Lumpy]

Dayum.

Imagine if over 150 years after the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, just somehow- by some justification or rationalization- black people were still being forced to work or be bullwhipped.

[Ghost]

It means Roberts has no balls. We need Trump to replace Ginsberg. Then be ready for CW II.

They had the 4 votes needed, it may mean they didn’t have the 5th vote that would have mattered.

These rejections may be more insidious than what it appears. I couldn't find the actual rule to verify this (been out of the law game for 17 years, and didn't practice before the Supreme Court anyway), but my memory from law school was that only four votes were needed to accept a cert petition. Which would imply that at least one of the four more conservative justices did not vote in favor. Hopefully, someone on the forum can enlighten us further.

It’s been said before that if the 4 conservatives don’t feel they have the fifth vote lined up they won’t vote to accept it. We need RBG to kickoff and be replaced by a true conservative to test this theory.

[LarryP]

No time left to get a conservative judge in there if she did leave. Dems would lock it up and then trump is gone in January

[Holland&Holland]

No time left to get a conservative judge in there if she did leave. Dems would lock it up and then trump is gone in January

How is Trump gone in January?

[yukonjasper]

Mail in ballots. Character assassination. The economy is held in check to make the administration look ineffective. Marxist bullying.

I'm sure I could come up with more if I thought about it. It is all out war. Kruschev's predicted will come true......

The righteous are muffled by the tyranny of political correctness and virtue signaling. White guilt is real and ignorance and misery are strong levers for the skillful deceivers to pull.

The educational system has been priming the pump for years. Add the "everyone gets a trophy " mental slap when young, soft headed, mommy and daddy's couch sittersget when the the real world doesn't work like middle school athletics--- there is some real anger and thirst for "justice ". Good fuel for the brainwashed useful idiots/foot soldiers.