Tim Walz as VP ???

[Ranb]

The new law says, "The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district".

As far as I know, there is not a single school putting tampons in the boy's restroom. Why should they? Unless they have girls identifying as boys and using the boy's restroom, they would have no need for tampons in the boy's restroom. Is this happening in MN school restrooms?

[ashes]

I think you are missing the point.

The girl is a girl, and the girl can get all the tampons she wants in the girls' restroom. All this drama over something already accessible? This is exactly the kind of pointless and stupid legislation that the political left counts as their specialty. And here you are defending it. Now there is compliance, documents, forms, and all kinds of stuff being created that will be in the government canon forever.

The schools already provide tampons. If she doesn't want to use the restroom she can see the school nurse and get tampons. They are not inaccessible. Yet you won't admit that this legislation is nothing more than a give-in to the batsh*t crazy members of your own camp at the expense of the state and in suspension of reality.,

The people in your own camp - though you have not professed this - insist that tampons need to be available for the boys. I suspect that is the bigger part of it. This reminds me of the news coverage of our peaceful protests. The reporter is on the air talking about how peaceful the protestors are when in the background all you see are flames and enraged rioters hurling stones. You are like the reporter. You are trying to maintain plausible deniability, you are affirming that boys do not menstruate, while in the background, not on this forum, you have the hordes of activists insisting that boys need tampons.

[hard h2o]

I think people need to remember that young girls might need hygiene products at any time. Having them readily available at school is a very nice thing, even if they can't pay for them.

In boy’s bathrooms?

Are there boys who menstruate?

There are no boys who menstruate. Why do you care where the tampons are put? Surely you're not that delicate?

So why add expense and mandate that they be in boy's restrooms.

Girls do not or should not go into the boy's restroom, boys do not menstruate, therefore it makes no sense.

This issue is just a small part of the failures of the Walz administration.

If you pay more for something than you should have do you expect your money back?

Do you expect departments within our government and appointees by a governor to have a responsibility to curtail obvious fraud?

If so then Walz is a failure.

[gun_fan111v2]

I think people need to remember that young girls might need hygiene products at any time. Having them readily available at school is a very nice thing, even if they can't pay for them.

In boy’s bathrooms?

Are there boys who menstruate?

There are no boys who menstruate. Why do you care where the tampons are put? Surely you're not that delicate?

For one, this will double the cost of buying dispensers. It would not surpirise me if younger boys will waste a bunch of product too, just goofing around. What a waste of tax $.

[atomic41]

Why are you guys still engaging with this clown? He's obviously a troll. He hates Trump, and his anti gun agenda, but seemingly praises comrade Waltz who has signed into law everything he claims Trump wants to do.

This troll is an agitator. The left uses a combination of paid agitators and AI bots mostly to spread disinformation and gather information (for AI learning). Many people can't resist arguing with them but the best thing to do is just ignore (ghost) them like you do for a stalker. Often times they operate with multiple identities so this one might also be Mark K.

Just ignore them because they are as fake as Cumhala's quick change ethnicity, or tampon Tim's combat service.

[Ranb]

The people in your own camp - though you have not professed this - insist that tampons need to be available for the boys. I suspect that is the bigger part of it. This reminds me of the news coverage of our peaceful protests. The reporter is on the air talking about how peaceful the protestors are when in the background all you see are flames and enraged rioters hurling stones. You are like the reporter. You are trying to maintain plausible deniability, you are affirming that boys do not menstruate, while in the background, not on this forum, you have the hordes of activists insisting that boys need tampons.

My camp? What camp is that? I am not saying to make tampons available to boys. Neither is that law I linked to. The new law says, "The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district".

Can you point to any menstruating boys? I think not. So why are you so butt hurt over this law? Why do you believe the crap that others are saying instead of just reading the law?

I do not have anyone at all, ever, talking for me. Who are you to claim otherwise?

[Ranb]

So why add expense and mandate that they be in boy's restrooms.

Girls do not or should not go into the boy's restroom, boys do not menstruate, therefore it makes no sense.

The law does not require that tampons be put in the boys restrooms. Are you reading a different law than I am? Have you read any actual plans by schools to put them into the boy's restrooms in MN?

[Ranb]

This troll is an agitator. The left uses a combination of paid agitators and AI bots mostly to spread disinformation and gather information (for AI learning). Many people can't resist arguing with them but the best thing to do is just ignore (ghost) them like you do for a stalker. Often times they operate with multiple identities so this one might also be Mark K.

Just ignore them because they are as fake as Cumhala's quick change ethnicity, or tampon Tim's combat service.

So posting a link to a new law is trolling now?

Do you think I was a paid agitator who met with senator Wolf back in 2011 to push for a silencer bill as part of some to nefarious plant undermine our youth in school bathrooms? Sounds insane when you say it that way.

If you are going to claim that I have multiple accounts here in violation of the forum rules, then you should be proving it. Are personal attacks the best you can do here?

[Lumpy]

Maybe the idea is that if e.g. a girl's bathroom is closed for repair and one of the boy's bathrooms is temporarily reassigned, the tampon dispensers are there in case.

[Holland&Holland]

This troll is an agitator. The left uses a combination of paid agitators and AI bots mostly to spread disinformation and gather information (for AI learning). Many people can't resist arguing with them but the best thing to do is just ignore (ghost) them like you do for a stalker. Often times they operate with multiple identities so this one might also be Mark K.

Just ignore them because they are as fake as Cumhala's quick change ethnicity, or tampon Tim's combat service.

So posting a link to a new law is trolling now?

Do you think I was a paid agitator who met with senator Wolf back in 2011 to push for a silencer bill as part of some to nefarious plant undermine our youth in school bathrooms? Sounds insane when you say it that way.

If you are going to claim that I have multiple accounts here in violation of the forum rules, then you should be proving it. Are personal attacks the best you can do here?

I thought you were fine with personal attacks?

[Ranb]

I thought you were fine with personal attacks?

You told me that personal attacks were frowned upon here. That is obviously untrue. Why don't you tell the truth instead?

[Holland&Holland]

I thought you were fine with personal attacks?

You told me that personal attacks were frowned upon here. That is obviously untrue. Why don't you tell the truth instead?

I did, and you responded that you were used to such and implied I should do the same. That is my point. How is that untruthful?