Republicans Stand Firm

Firearms related political discussion forum

Republicans Stand Firm

Postby jdege on Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:34 pm

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/01/republicans-stand-firm.php
Republicans Stand Firm
Today the House convened for the opening of its 2025 session. All 67 Republicans were present; not a single Democrat chose to attend. Minnesota’s partisan Democrat Secretary of State, Steve Simon, has the ceremonial duty of convening the House. Simon abused that ceremonial role by purporting to find that there was not a quorum, and suggesting that the House should adjourn. That suggestion, which he has no legal authority to make, was based on absurd legal reasoning, as I explained in the post linked above.

Having delivered his ill-founded advice, Simon fled the premises. Republicans then took over. Majority Leader Harry Niska took the gavel and announced the presence of a quorum. The members who were present–all Republicans–then elected Lisa Demuth as Speaker. They adopted rules for the session and conducted a few other items of business, and will return tomorrow to continue the 2025 session.

At some point, the Democrats will come skulking back to the Capitol to assume their minority status. Meanwhile, the Republicans have called their bluff, and the Democrats’ attempt to bring the House to its knees failed. At the moment, there are only 67 sworn members of the House of Representatives, all Republicans. The Democrats held a fake swearing-in ceremony on Sunday afternoon, conducted off-premises by a retired judge. That farcical proceeding had no legal significance; the real swearing-in ceremony was conducted today in the Capitol, as specifically provided by state law. The Democrats didn’t show up.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4735 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby Jackpine Savage on Thu Jan 16, 2025 7:39 am

About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.
"I'll just store it at my place in Arizona. :lol:" - Markemp - 2/18/24 (referring to his M1A if it should be banned in MN)
User avatar
Jackpine Savage
 
Posts: 1879 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:45 am
Location: west central MN

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby xd ED on Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:37 am

If one is AWOL, do they get their per diem?
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9195 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby jdege on Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am

xd ED wrote:If one is AWOL, do they get their per diem?

Give that they didn't show up for the swearing in ceremony, none of them are legislators, yet.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4735 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Republicans Stand Firm

Postby dismal on Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:19 am

Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.


That’ll be something to see….
User avatar
dismal
 
Posts: 944 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:30 am
Location: Rochester, MN

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby atomic41 on Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:36 am

Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.



Didn't they answer that question with their ruling on serial number requirements for firearms?
atomic41
 
Posts: 452 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:24 pm

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby Jackpine Savage on Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:58 am

atomic41 wrote:
Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.



Didn't they answer that question with their ruling on serial number requirements for firearms?


Did they finally rule on the serial number case? If so I missed it.
"I'll just store it at my place in Arizona. :lol:" - Markemp - 2/18/24 (referring to his M1A if it should be banned in MN)
User avatar
Jackpine Savage
 
Posts: 1879 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:45 am
Location: west central MN

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby atomic41 on Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:03 am

Jackpine Savage wrote:
atomic41 wrote:
Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.



Didn't they answer that question with their ruling on serial number requirements for firearms?


Did they finally rule on the serial number case? If so I missed it.


Hmmm...I thought they did but after your reply I did a quick search and I'm not seeing it. I might be wrong on that, I'll have to dig deeper when I have more time.
atomic41
 
Posts: 452 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 7:24 pm

Re: Republicans Stand Firm

Postby bstrawse on Thu Jan 16, 2025 12:54 pm

Jackpine Savage wrote:
atomic41 wrote:
Jackpine Savage wrote:About time.

Now we get to see if the MN Supremes have any integrity.



Didn't they answer that question with their ruling on serial number requirements for firearms?


Did they finally rule on the serial number case? If so I missed it.


No
Chair, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & Minnesota Gun Owners Political Action Committee - Join the Caucus TODAY
MN Permit to Carry Instructor| NRA Instructor | NRA Chief Range Safety Officer | Twitter | Facebook
User avatar
bstrawse
Moderator
 
Posts: 4222 [View]
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:45 am
Location: Roseville, MN


Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron