Was the vote on HF 13 pure party line?

View · by **Lumpy** on Fri Mar 07, 2025 8:59 pm

It's late, I'm tired and I'm not finding a breakdown by party; would someone tabulate this for me please?

View · by **bstrawse** on Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:27 pm

Lumpy wrote:It's late, I'm tired and I'm not finding a breakdown by party; would someone tabulate this for me please?

We posted the vote on Facebook and Twitter - it was along party lines with no defections.
b

View · by **warrlac** on Sun Mar 09, 2025 10:43 am

bstrawse wrote:
Lumpy wrote:It's late, I'm tired and I'm not finding a breakdown by party; would someone tabulate this for me please?

We posted the vote on Facebook and Twitter - it was along party lines with no defections.
b

Last week's public hearing and debate on the subject was definitely not a waste of energy or effort. Rarely in Minnesota are the voices of Conservatives listened to or heeded on the first go-around. In this case, MNGOC and (I think) even the NRA spoke about the crazy judicially created "duty to retreat".

Most people do not know that there is NOTHING in Minnesota law that specifies duty to retreat. Many people do today as a result of last week's hearing...

Thank you MNGOC.

Warrlac

Was the vote on HF 13 pure party line?

Was the vote on HF 13 pure party line?

Re: Was the vote on HF 13 pure party line?

Re: Was the vote on HF 13 pure party line?

Who is online