Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Firearms related political discussion forum

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby gunflint on Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:16 pm

I'm ashamed to say that I only scored a 36. But I may be getting soft in this, the early fall of my life. I even find myself reading Dick Ungers posts and once in a while saying to myself "That makes sense" :D
The 2nd Amendment is the ONLY amendment in the Bill of Rights that specifies that it shall not be infringed.
User avatar
gunflint
 
Posts: 424 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Duluth

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby Pat on Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:35 pm

plblark wrote:
Dick Unger wrote:[...] Gun rights are more of a libertarian vs authoritarian issue. The current Democratic leaders are real authoritarian liberals and very anti gun. But it is a myth that guns are purely a conservative issue. And the current "conservatives" accept the money and votes of gun owners but give only token and passive support.


VERY Well said, as usual.


Well said, and so true...
"Happiness is...finding two olives in your martini when you're hungry." -Johnny Carson
Cardinal Kung Foundation , The Rule of Saint Benedict
User avatar
Pat
 
Posts: 3567 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Western Burbs

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby joelr on Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:28 am

[deleted by poster]
Last edited by joelr on Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
joelr
 
Posts: 461 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:07 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby e5usmc on Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:58 pm

I'm going to have to admit, again, :oops: that I had to look up another of your word's Joel (keep 'em coming, btw).

However, I'm still not sure I fully understand the term "jingoism".

The easiest definition I've found is:

noun [U] DISAPPROVING
the extreme belief that your own country is always best, which is often shown in enthusiastic support for a war against another country:
Patriotism can turn into jingoism and intolerance very quickly.


Is this a pejorative term?

Sorry for the ignorance... Just want to understand...
User avatar
e5usmc
 
Posts: 97 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby DeanC on Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:01 pm

e5usmc wrote:Is this a pejorative term?

Yes, see also Yellow Journalism
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.
User avatar
DeanC
 
Posts: 8502 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:22 am
Location: Captain Cufflinks

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby plblark on Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:05 pm

The hard part is avoiding jingoism without going to the opposite extreme ... That of thinking anything your country does must obviously be bad or immoral or corrupt.
private or small grou permit classes available
"I'll take a huge order of fiscal responsibility, a side of small government, hold the religion please. " Paraphrase from Tamara K
RIP 1911Fan
User avatar
plblark
 
Posts: 6794 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Roseville

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby joelr on Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:16 pm

[deleted by poster]
Last edited by joelr on Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
joelr
 
Posts: 461 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:07 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby JDR on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:24 pm

gunflint wrote:I'm ashamed to say that I only scored a 36. But I may be getting soft in this, the early fall of my life. I even find myself reading Dick Ungers posts and once in a while saying to myself "That makes sense" :D


me too................ :roll: :roll: :roll:

Mine was a 31.
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them" George Mason
User avatar
JDR
 
Posts: 100 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:05 am
Location: Victoria

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby joelr on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:42 pm

[deleted by poster]
Last edited by joelr on Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
joelr
 
Posts: 461 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:07 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby Dick Unger on Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:33 pm

gunflint wrote:I'm ashamed to say that I only scored a 36. But I may be getting soft in this, the early fall of my life. I even find myself reading Dick Ungers posts and once in a while saying to myself "That makes sense" :D



And this is how it all starts...in a few years you'll be eating quiche', savin' whales and votin' for Democrats. Sort of like the first few cigarettes I smoked as a teenager...
Dick Unger
 
Posts: 733 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby mostly- on Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:12 pm

:shock: OMG... where did I go wrong??? Only 37 out of 40... The dam libs at work are rubbing off on me!!!! :oops:

Mostly-
mostly-
 
Posts: 20 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:06 pm

Re: Not Minnesota specific, but definitly political

Postby GregM on Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:21 am

joelr wrote:I'd use "chauvanism", instead, but, well, it's French, and two of the things I can't stand are intolerance and the French.


GOOD ONE !!!
FLEE IF YOU CAN. FIGHT IF YOU MUST.
User avatar
GregM
 
Posts: 884 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:31 pm

Previous

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron