LarryFlew wrote:Grayskies wrote:I think there is something fundamentally wrong when you have to be rich to be able to sue the government to overturn an unconstitutional law. Righs should be for all not just for those that can afford them.
Have to be rich seems to be the problem all along from being able to run for office to being the guy that can afford to be involved in a law suit of any kind. Like getting a bank loan, if you don't need the money it's easy to get a loan. If you REALLY need the money you're SOL.
They screwed the pooch long before any of us were born from a need money to be anything in politics standpoint. The days of anyone can grow up to be (insert political post here) ended a long time ago.
I agree, you need money to do anything these days, it use to be if you didn't like things, you rounded up some supplies and walked or rode away, home steading or building a cabin someplace remote and living off the land. No taxes, so whiny libs stripping you of firearms... Closest you can get is Alaska and they still require permits to hunt and such...
It seems like you can't even breath in the US with out some kind of fee or tax, I know you can't die with out one. Maybe we need to rework how this country funtions some and while were at it evict some squaters we have too many people already.
(sorry I had some hopes that we would not be rules by rich elite aristocrats, we fought a war about that I thought.)