Montana draws line in sand....

Firearms related political discussion forum

Montana draws line in sand....

Postby bigshooter on Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:44 am

Montana secretary of state, BRAD JOHNSON, writes letter to the Washington Times.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbc ... e=nextpage


Second Amendment an individual right



The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide D.C. v. Heller, the first case in more than 60 years in which the court will confront the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Although Heller is about the constitutionality of the D.C. handgun ban, the court's decision will have an impact far beyond the District ("Promises breached," Op-Ed, Thursday).



The court must decide in Heller whether the Second Amendment secures a right for individuals to keep and bear arms or merely grants states the power to arm their militias, the National Guard. This latter view is called the "collective rights" theory.



A collective rights decision by the court would violate the contract by which Montana entered into statehood, called the Compact With the United States and archived at Article I of the Montana Constitution. When Montana and the United States entered into this bilateral contract in 1889, the U.S. approved the right to bear arms in the Montana Constitution, guaranteeing the right of "any person" to bear arms, clearly an individual right.



There was no assertion in 1889 that the Second Amendment was susceptible to a collective rights interpretation, and the parties to the contract understood the Second Amendment to be consistent with the declared Montana constitutional right of "any person" to bear arms.



As a bedrock principle of law, a contract must be honored so as to give effect to the intent of the contracting parties. A collective rights decision by the court in Heller would invoke an era of unilaterally revisable contracts by violating the statehood contract between the United States and Montana, and many other states.



Numerous Montana lawmakers have concurred in a resolution raising this contract-violation issue. It's posted at progunleaders.org. The United States would do well to keep its contractual promise to the states that the Second Amendment secures an individual right now as it did upon execution of the statehood contract.



BRAD JOHNSON



Montana secretary of state



Helena, Mont.

"to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually. . . ." --George Mason, June 14, 1788
bigshooter
 
Posts: 27 [View]
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:54 pm

Re: Montana draws line in sand....

Postby JoeH on Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:53 am

Another reason to like Montana!
Joe
Not a Glock Certified Armorer
User avatar
JoeH
 
Posts: 3687 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:56 am
Location: 1911 JMB Drive

Re: Montana draws line in sand....

Postby mnglocker on Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:19 pm

Like I said on the other site, "Now you know why I want to live in Montana"
-Get a rope Tuco.
What happens in the basement stays in the basement.


http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
mnglocker
 
Posts: 4722 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:25 am

Re: Montana draws line in sand....

Postby meltedeyes on Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:10 pm

Just reaffirms my desire to move back home. Hell, even my dad thinks that I should.

Yes I'm from MT, and I've always been proud of that fact. Now only if the damn Californians would go back home.
User avatar
meltedeyes
 
Posts: 312 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Coon Rapids


Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron