Page 2 of 2

Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 5:48 pm
by oldhunter
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater
These are links that go to facebook and are copies of a letter I received from Nolan. If you read the letter you will see how he feels about gun owners. He is after your modern sporting rifles. He thinks the second amendment was for hunting. That is his way of supporting the second amendment. He needs more then somebody to pay for firearms training.
If you click on the photo's you can read them full size.

Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:35 pm
by Rip Van Winkle
...I also intend to push for more thorough background checks on gun sales, restrictions on high-capacity magazines and a limitation on assault weapons. I will insist this legislation protects responsible hunters and gun owners by exempting specifically named weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes and grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment.

The way I read that, his Lordship wants to create a list of approved weapons he will allow us peasants to own. How gracious of him.

This clown need to go.

Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 4:24 am
by MJY65
Rip Van Winkle wrote:
...I also intend to push for more thorough background checks on gun sales, restrictions on high-capacity magazines and a limitation on assault weapons. I will insist this legislation protects responsible hunters and gun owners by exempting specifically named weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes and grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment.

The way I read that, his Lordship wants to create a list of approved weapons he will allow us peasants to own. How gracious of him.

This clown need to go.


That certainly leaves no doubt about his stand. Unfortunately, people are supposed to be more concerned about Mills' hair styling habits.

BTW: Why is Mills vilified for having money, but Dayton and Franken are not? Oh yeah, only Republican money is evil. :roll:

Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 7:09 am
by ex-LT
MJY65 wrote:
Rip Van Winkle wrote:
...I also intend to push for more thorough background checks on gun sales, restrictions on high-capacity magazines and a limitation on assault weapons. I will insist this legislation protects responsible hunters and gun owners by exempting specifically named weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes and grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment.

The way I read that, his Lordship wants to create a list of approved weapons he will allow us peasants to own. How gracious of him.

This clown need to go.


That certainly leaves no doubt about his stand. Unfortunately, people are supposed to be more concerned about Mills' hair styling habits.

BTW: Why is Mills vilified for having money, but Dayton and Franken are not? Oh yeah, only Republican money is evil. :roll:

I think their problem is because Mills inherited his money.

What's that? Mark Dayton inherited his money?


Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:00 am
by Rip Van Winkle
Not only did Dayton inherit his money, he shelters it in a SD bank to avoid MN taxes.

Re: MNGOPAC tells Rick Nolan: We'll pay for firearms training

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:38 am
by ex-LT
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Not only did Dayton inherit his money, he shelters it in a SD bank to avoid MN taxes.

Oh, I know that, too. I just find it interesting confusing a little hypocritical of the Democrats to point fingers at the likes of Stuart Mills' and Mike McFadden's "fortunes", while conveniently ignoring Mark Dayton's.