Just throwing this out there - I know there are much more savvy people out there than me.
Is there a reason why we are making suppressors our central point? I know that Dayton has said he'll veto a suppressor bill - but what will be sent to him is not a suppressor bill - it's an omnibus bill that contains many items he is probably in favor of. Suppressors are only a small fraction of what is in that bill. Can't we call out the multitude of other items that he 'has to have' and address suppressors on the periphery?
Again - just a thought. But it seems like we're going about this the wrong way. Any ad's specifically addressing suppressors(and I don't know what the ad's contain) are probably only going to be favored by people who already know what they are about - whereas people who don't probably already have opinions provided to them(by Hollywood). I don't know that it's possible to convince someone(even a gun owner uneducated in suppressors) in a 30 second spot. Lets focus on 'common sense' legislation that the Governor would veto just because he has an unfounded fear of suppressors?