MNGunTalk.com

Ghost wrote:
Will be interesting to see the effect on Cornish

MJY65 wrote:The liberals have really got themselves in a pickle. They've created this monster and it is turning on them. They either need to admit that it was a witch hunt to begin with and drop the crap about Trump's ET comments, or be prepared to watch half the politicians and celebrities go down.

xd ED wrote:

Ghost wrote:
Will be interesting to see the effect on Cornish

Who?

yukonjasper wrote:The question is whether the "feminists" are willing to persecute ALL perpetrators regardless of political leaning, even if that means taking out the power structure of the Liberal machine and exposing the hipocrasy of some in the "movement". Will they have the conviction around the "cause" or will they back off when told.

xd ED wrote:

yukonjasper wrote:The question is whether the "feminists" are willing to persecute ALL perpetrators regardless of political leaning, even if that means taking out the power structure of the Liberal machine and exposing the hipocrasy of some in the "movement". Will they have the conviction around the "cause" or will they back off when told.

Many of these so called ' feminists' lack the critical thinking skills to reach a rational point of view.
Witness the mob with the "I BELIEVE HER' signs who openly supported for president, the enabler of the most notorious purveyor of sexual harassment this country has seen.

Senator Al Franken (D-MN) appears to have broken a federal statute that criminalizes non-consensual sexual contact in special territorial jurisdictions such as the USO C-17 cargo plane traveling from Afghanistan to the United States on which he groped Leeann Tweeden in her sleep. This could spell additional trouble for Franken, who is already facing a Senate Ethics Committee investigation into his conduct, as he almost certainly committed a federal felony in 2006.

Unfortunately for Franken, 18 U.S.C. § 2244 (b) prescribes in very clear detail that “Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States… knowingly engages in sexual contact with another person without that other person’s permission shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”:

Furthermore, in more bad news for Franken, 18 U.S.C. § 2246 (3) defines “sexual contact” as “the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.”:

Sorcerer wrote:Now what would be interesting is if/ when the first male steps up to claim that he’s been groped, butt pinched, forced. Be it female or male. The female groper, what will the feminists and progressives have to say.

OldmanFCSA wrote:

Sorcerer wrote:Now what would be interesting is if/ when the first male steps up to claim that he’s been groped, butt pinched, forced. Be it female or male. The female groper, what will the feminists and progressives have to say.

I don't often enter these discussions, but the quoted text above beat me to the Punch. When are we men going to allege sexual abuse against the female population. We men have been pressured by masculinity to not report any such instances in the past, but now we need to speak up for ourselves "To balance the scales of Justice".