MNGunTalk.com

Two days in and it is already starting.

House Democrats will introduce their proposal to require universal backgrounds checks for gun sales on Tuesday, the eighth anniversary of former Rep. Gabby Gifford’s shooting, according Democratic lawmakers and aides.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Rep. Mike Thompson (Calif.) — who heads up a Democratic task force on gun violence — will join Giffords in introducing the bill, which will be dubbed “H.R. 8” in honor of the Arizona Democratic lawmaker.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-dems-to-introduce-gun-backgrounds-checks-bill-on-tuesday/ar-BBROzSs?li=BBnbcA1

It accomplishes nothing

Ghost wrote:It accomplishes nothing

It accomplished more than you think for them.

I've a suggestion, let's all stop using the liberal lexicon and start calling this what it really is, universal registration.

Rip Van Winkle wrote:I've a suggestion, let's all stop using the liberal lexicon and start calling this what it really is, universal registration.

Yep;

Once UBCs are in place, it will be easy to demonstrate the futility of such 'safety measures' without a national registry... which will be a short, ''commonsense' next step for the mindsets that are more interested in ensuring your correct behavior.

Holland&Holland wrote:

Ghost wrote:It accomplishes nothing

It accomplished more than you think for them.

Now, don't be paranoid....

xd ED wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:

Ghost wrote:It accomplishes nothing

It accomplished more than you think for them.

Now, don't be paranoid....

It's not paranoia if they truly are after you

The modern democrat party are THE domestic enemies our Founders warned us about.

Holland&Holland wrote:

xd ED wrote:


Now, don't be paranoid....

It's not paranoia if they truly are after you

xd ED wrote:

Rip Van Winkle wrote:I've a suggestion, let's all stop using the liberal lexicon and start calling this what it really is, universal registration.

Yep;

Once UBCs are in place, it will be easy to demonstrate the futility of such 'safety measures' without a national registry... which will be a short, ''commonsense' next step for the mindsets that are more interested in ensuring your correct behavior.

The '86 FOPA would be a roadblock. Two questions, can an act be line item repealed, and does the FOPA gun registration ban apply to the states or just the feds?

Tronster wrote:

xd ED wrote:

Rip Van Winkle wrote:I've a suggestion, let's all stop using the liberal lexicon and start calling this what it really is, universal registration.

Yep;

Once UBCs are in place, it will be easy to demonstrate the futility of such 'safety measures' without a national registry... which will be a short, ''commonsense' next step for the mindsets that are more interested in ensuring your correct behavior.

The '86 FOPA would be a roadblock. Two questions, can an act be line item repealed, and does the FOPA gun registration ban apply to the states or just the feds?

Nothing is permanent and it looks to only apply to the feds.

Then they will just pressure states to enact state level registration requirements when they have favorable Dem majorities. And when it doesn't 'do enough' they can pass mag/gun bans and curtail ammo sales just like CA.

Once infringement starts where does it stop?

Holland&Holland wrote:Once infringement starts where does it stop?

It doesn't stop, it just slows down a little while waiting for the rail cars to come back for the last of the 'cargo".

At that point, it would only stop if/when there was a Nationwide Revolt. Which I'm not sure whether it would happen or not?