That chart's absolutely werthless!

Here's the real one! ...

And the winner is! ...

Christ! ... don't you guys know nothin'?!

Stradawhovious wrote:That's nice. Enjoy your spikes! I know I enjoy my DPMS.
Bessy wrote:Tactical operators rarely favor revo's in 45acp... but maybe he's so tactical he's gone all the way around the spectrum. He's so tactical, that he's gone past the custom nighthawk 1911's and and back into revovler land..... I think we may have found new operator messiah...
ahrens wrote:That chart's absolutely werthless!
And the winner is! ...
Christ! ... don't you guys know nothin'?!
hammAR wrote:IF that was directed to me,
hammAR wrote:ahrens wrote:That chart's absolutely werthless!
And the winner is! ...
Christ! ... don't you guys know nothin'?!
First, Christ had nothing to do with it, so why invoke him into this.......
Second, you can't spell for ****.....werthless
Finally, you sure pick out f'ugly guns.............
Stradawhovious wrote:Not directed at you Gunny, If it was, I would have properly addressed you. You have your reasons for owning what you do, and I have mine.
I just think that DPMS has their place in the firearms community and are priced accordingly. To blindly ridicule them as crap is silly. If you (also not directed at you Gunny....) want to give criticisms towards brand A or model X, give reasons, not just "'cause I said so". Blindly poo-pooing anything is counterproductive.
Unless its a Glock or a Hi-point. Their craptastic reputation needs no support.
ahrens wrote:Yer jest cranky 'cause Colt ain't #1.
hammAR wrote:Fair enough, but remember that I do not blindly poo-poo anything, unless it is in jest.............
Stradawhovious wrote: If you (also not directed at you Gunny....) want to give criticisms towards brand A or model X, give reasons, not just "'cause I said so". Blindly poo-pooing anything is counterproductive.
hammAR wrote:
Maybe, but I can assure you that I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for the Singer SP1 that I had............
westberg wrote:When was the last time a civilian had to defend themselves from multiple attackers in the US with a AR of any brand and it failed on them?
If it's not a Colt, JP Enterprises or a Wilson Combat it's just for show and tell anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
goalie wrote:westberg wrote:When was the last time a civilian had to defend themselves from multiple attackers in the US with a AR of any brand and it failed on them?
If it's not a Colt, JP Enterprises or a Wilson Combat it's just for show and tell anyway.![]()
![]()
![]()
It's never the LAST time that matters, it's the NEXT time. Didn't you get the mall-ninja newsletter Monday?!?!?! They have an article about that in hella-high-speed section......
goalie wrote:hammAR wrote:
Maybe, but I can assure you that I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for the Singer SP1 that I had............
That sums up this, and ANY thread of this nature. We are all a product of our life's experiences. Some of those experiences involve failure of a piece of equipment. Some of those experiences involve failure of the person using the equipment. In the end, most of us are going to listen to our own personal ghosts from the past before we listen to internet or gun-store chatter.
Just because I am too big of a spaz to trust myself with a safety on a handgun doesn't mean hammAR shouldn't carry matched 1911's cocked-and-locked in bilateral SOB holsters. Do/carry/buy what works for YOU, and if you practice enough to actually know what works for you, then you'll figure out what equipment is sub-par and what isn't along the way.
YMMV
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests