IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby goalie on Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:24 am

gman1868 wrote:Was it bitching or just trying to explain the rules?

It's a game, it's not tactical training.

Please don't take personal offense when you don't feel like following the rules, or complain about a CSO bringing it to your attention.

Enjoy it for what it is, a fun day at the range, with like-minded folks, where you can run around and shoot paper with freinds.

Just think of all the tacticool gear you will have the excuse to buy ;) :D


I knew the rule about the mag changes. I ignored that rule, because, IMO, it is stupid, and I happen to know that it is not how I personally changed magazines in a gunfight when I was well-trained, so it sure as hell isn't how I am going to do it now that I am old and not-so-well trained. It apparently really offended some people that I was very obviously changing magazines the way I chose to and taking a penalty (IIRC, they add some time to your score) instead of drinking the IDPA Kool-Aid.

It just takes the "fun" out of it if people feel the need to be a-holes about how I am shooting the course of fire. It was not like I was breaking a rule regarding safety.

(FWIW, it was not the range safety officer bitching, it was other "competitors" that were bitching.)
It turns out that what you have is less important than what you do with it.
User avatar
goalie
 
Posts: 3812 [View]
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:45 pm

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby Jeff Bergquist on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:02 am

goalie wrote:
gman1868 wrote:Was it bitching or just trying to explain the rules?

It's a game, it's not tactical training.

Please don't take personal offense when you don't feel like following the rules, or complain about a CSO bringing it to your attention.

Enjoy it for what it is, a fun day at the range, with like-minded folks, where you can run around and shoot paper with freinds.

Just think of all the tacticool gear you will have the excuse to buy ;) :D


I knew the rule about the mag changes. I ignored that rule, because, IMO, it is stupid, and I happen to know that it is not how I personally changed magazines in a gunfight when I was well-trained, so it sure as hell isn't how I am going to do it now that I am old and not-so-well trained. It apparently really offended some people that I was very obviously changing magazines the way I chose to and taking a penalty (IIRC, they add some time to your score) instead of drinking the IDPA Kool-Aid.

It just takes the "fun" out of it if people feel the need to be a-holes about how I am shooting the course of fire. It was not like I was breaking a rule regarding safety.

(FWIW, it was not the range safety officer bitching, it was other "competitors" that were bitching.)

IMO you're missing one of the points of the competition. It isn't just about how fast you can shoot, the competitions are designed and intended so that gun and ammo manipulation is part of it as well. Your attitude seems to be that if you were playing hopscotch you'd just trot to the end of the course, because "That's not the way I walk in real life." Hopscotch isn't about walking, and IDPA isn't about training for actual life and death scenarios. It's a game, with rules, that lets you practice some things that may be more or less useful when the S actually HTF.
The bold type giveth, the fine print taketh away.
Jeff Bergquist
 
Posts: 915 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby westberg on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:08 am

Here we have two usually very reasonable minds expressing their opinion about a sport that one of them I don't think has ever shot it and the other admittedly shooting it once.

1911fan wrote:I have stayed out of this because my views are well known.
If its only a game take the word practical or defensive out of the titles.
These were all started to be training/as close to real life as practical events.


1911fan, you have never mention in front of me that you have shot IDPA. Other then a few minor rule changes, teaks on equipment and adding new firearms IDPA is the same as when it first started.
In our talks you were referring to USPSA or the Practical Pistol League at Oakdale that you had a problem with it. I quite frankly find it hard to believe even you believe your arguments. I think Tim has a standing offer to let you come out and show him how it should be done.

goalie wrote:I realize that you can shoot it however you want to, I was just really disappointed with the whole "gamer" vibe and mentality. I would have enjoyed it a lot more without some jerkoffs that I don't know bitching at me because I was doing the course of fire the way I really would and not trying to juggle magazines like a monkey ******* a football. And, reality check, if you find yourself in any position to bitch about me out-shooting you with a handgun, regardless of whether or not I "cheat" at magazine changes, you have other things to bitch about. Lots of other things.

In the end, I can train however I want without paying to do it just about anytime I want to. Then, at least the only one bitching is me.

Goalie you play Hockey and work in profession that has rules that govern I'm guessing 100% or close to it everything you do at work. I'm sure you can see shortcuts or faster ways to do things but don't because your job would be on the line and your patients care may be hurt by shortcuts.
So in a game you shoot a course of fire faster then the other competitors because they were following a set of rules for the course and you decided there was a faster way by not following the rule and they are the jerkoffs? I would guess that if you had decided to follow the mag change rules it would not have scared your highly trained mag chances in a real gun fight.

Last night we had 35 people attend the IDPA Match and some of those competitors didn't do the proper mag change and guess what nobody cared except the competitor getting the extra time and what they cared about was under the clock they made a mistake that cost them points.

If you don't like the rules don't play you won't be missed, but if you try it again I'm sure you would be welcomed to the event.
User avatar
westberg
 
Posts: 4830 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Wyoming, MN

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby mmcnx2 on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:21 am

Man you guys sure take this serious for playing a game. The parity is funny I don't care what you say, lighten up it was intended as a joke.
User avatar
mmcnx2
 
Posts: 2208 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Hanover, MN

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby rugersol on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:22 am

Pat Cannon wrote:
ahrens wrote:Also double-check USPSA rules as to using an IWB. ... and even then, I'd recommend against it. ... most folks seem to tend to cover theyselves reholstering. ... and that's a DQ.

Don't know about USPSA rules, but I see no reason to avoid an IWB holster for IDPA. It's true people need to learn how to reholster safely but it's not hard, and we both know plenty of guys with OWB holsters still manage to threaten their kidneys while they feel around with the muzzle. And especially if you carry IWB, you should learn how to do it right, right?

Sort of.

I'm not saying that, should someone (in need of "training") attending a USPSA/IDPA match shouldn't, or won't, get some "training". In fact, I do the orientation at Oakdale on Thursday nites, as well as RO quite a few shooters ... and as I do both, I do a fair amount of "coaching". This is not new. This is how it was, when I showed up for my first match. That's the atmosphere, at these matches.

That said, these are, first and foremost USPSA matches. You don't wanna get DQ'd? ... ya better read the rulebook ... listen intently to the orientation ... and the RO.

I don't wanna scare folks off ... but DQ'ing is NOT fun ... it's not 'sposed to be ... that's the point ... that's what makes us safe.

Folks need to show up to their first few (every, actually) matches with absolutely nothing else on their mind, but NOT DQing.

One way to get DQ'd, is to point your pistol at your other hand. I've seen guys do this, attempting to reholster, with two hands.

We had a guy use an IWB jest this summer. I never told him he couldn't use it. I don't believe anyone else told him he couldn't use it. Unlike some folks, I don't go runnin' fer the rulebook, everytime somethin' raises an eyebrow. Ya wanna know fer sure? ... read the rulebook. Otherwise, I saw no reason to disallow it. IWB is a common method of carry. It's legal in MN. In my opinion, if a guy can't compete in USPSA/IDPA with an IWB, those associations have dropped the ball. And it wouldn't be the first time. If IWB gave the shooter a competitive advantage, or the shooter was otherwise in contention for a National's slot or any other kind of award, and someone made a stink about it, and if the rulebook said "no IWB", I reckon we'd hafta change his score to zero. Even then, I'd let him shoot.

All that said, while I didn't personally see it, IIRC, the guy with the IWB got DQ'd his first nite. IIRC, he got DQ'd again, on another nite. IIRC, both DQ's were for covering his weak-hand. (by USPSA/IPSC rule, SO LONG AS YOUR FINGER IS OUTSIDE THE TRIGGER-GUARD, while drawing/reholstering, should your muzzle cover any portion of your body BELOW YOUR WAIST, this is NOT a DQ ... that MIGHT seem unsafe to some folks ... if ya wanna discuss it further, I suggest ya start a new thread ... it'll be a long one).

PERSONALLY, it's my preference to have new folks NOT DQ for their first few matches (and then some). Most such folks don't come back. I don't miss them. But then I've wasted my time, on them. Also, some very fine folks went outta their way to help make sure, when I started, I didn't DQ ... and I didn't (for a few years ... eventually, everyone does). Over the years, I've accepted a certain level of personal responsibility to carry on that "tradition". There's other folks who've done likewise.

If someone's interested in shooting USPSA/IDPA, it's my PERSONAL recommendation, that they do NOT use an IWB. They already have a lotta work cut out fer theyselves, to NOT DQ. Using an IWB, for those first few matches, is a good way to increase your odds of DQ'ing ... IMHO. That said, as far as I'm concerned, if ya wanna us IWB at Oakdale on Thursday nites, go for it! ... maybe check the rulebook on it, too? Image

If ya otherwise want a 99% guarantee that ya'll learn how to draw/reholster an IWB, without covering yerself, I'd suggest ya find a reputable instructor. While it IS possible, ya'd otherwise git that kinda "training" on a Thursday nite at Oakdale, I'd say yer odds of DQ are MUCH higher, than yer odds of learning how NOT to. Point of fact, I RO'd this new guy with the IWB this summer, on one stage. 'Fore I started him, I saw he was usin' IWB, and I went WAY outta my way, to point out to him, how most folks with an IWB tend to cover theyselves drawing/reholstering. I don't believe I DQ'd him. But, IIRC, he got DQ'd that nite by someone else ... for that very thing. Moreover, if ya wanna work on drawing/reholstering an IWB w/o gettin' DQ'd, yer much better off practicing it at home, with an empty gun, than for the the first time, AT A MATCH.

On ANOTHER note, if ya EVER see anyone threatening theirs, or anyone else's kidneys with a loaded (even unloaded) gun, I strongly suggest ya take it up with 'em, immediately. There's absolutely no reason anyone should have their pistol angled in such a manner. And in fact, in all the years I've RO'd new shooters, I've NEVER seen anyone do any such thing.

Sorry fer the drawn out response ... I seem to be steppin' in it with otherwise short answers. Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby goalie on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:34 am

westberg wrote:
Last night we had 35 people attend the IDPA Match and some of those competitors didn't do the proper mag change and guess what nobody cared except the competitor getting the extra time and what they cared about was under the clock they made a mistake that cost them points.

If you don't like the rules don't play you won't be missed, but if you try it again I'm sure you would be welcomed to the event.


Oh, I am sure nobody is going to miss me. That said, I probably would have been coming back if I had experienced the same attitude you are talking about. It was the attitude that turned me off. I didn't care about the time I had added, and I didn't quite get why some people I didn't know seemed to care so much.......

I do have one question though, has anyone on here done a tactical magazine change in combat?


westberg wrote:So in a game you shoot a course of fire faster then the other competitors because they were following a set of rules for the course and you decided there was a faster way by not following the rule and they are the jerkoffs? I would guess that if you had decided to follow the mag change rules it would not have scared your highly trained mag chances in a real gun fight.


I didn't do it because it was faster. I did it because I have never counted rounds when I was sending them at someone shooting at me. I did it because I never changed a magazine in the middle of a gunfight when I still had rounds to be fighting with, especially when the people shooting at me were close.

But, you did hit the nail on the head with the "So, in a game" part. My biggest fault was believing the hype that it could be used as realistic training. I have since chosen to use my limited time at the range in a manner that suits me. I think IDPA (or any other pistol game) is a great activity, I just think that the hype about IDPA being real-world training is a little off-base. Most of my "real-world" training these days doesn't even involve shooting or even a firearm.

YMMV

(Oh, and comparing hockey to a gunfight is ridiculous. First off, I am good at hockey. Second, when I screw up at hockey, the red is the light on my neck, not my blood.)
It turns out that what you have is less important than what you do with it.
User avatar
goalie
 
Posts: 3812 [View]
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:45 pm

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby westberg on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:55 am

(Oh, and comparing hockey to a gunfight is ridiculous. First off, I am good at hockey. Second, when I screw up at hockey, the red is the light on my neck, not my blood.)

No my comment was in regards to playing a game, I'm sure you are very good at hockey and I bet you play by the rules. I made sure not to mention anything about IDPA in my response had to do with a real gun fight. I do not pretend or think IDPA is anything other then another shooting sport. What the parent organization says about it I can't control.

As a side note all of the accepted mag changes in IDPA are taught at all of the major tactical and self defense schools. I have never been in a real gun fight but we have competitors who have been and seem to make the transition to a shooting sport just fine.

I will extend a personal invitation to you to give it one more try, if for nothing else to see the sport is not filled with a bunch of jerkoffs.
User avatar
westberg
 
Posts: 4830 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Wyoming, MN

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby JoeH on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:57 am

Go, Westberg! It's your birthday!
Joe
Not a Glock Certified Armorer
User avatar
JoeH
 
Posts: 3687 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:56 am
Location: 1911 JMB Drive

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby rugersol on Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:58 am

JoeH wrote:Go, Westberg! It's your birthday!

Stars 'n Strikes at 5:30? Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby rugersol on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:00 am

westberg wrote:I will extend a personal invitation to you to give it one more try, if for nothing else to see the sport is not filled with a bunch of jerkoffs.

Not yet, it ain't ... but if ya keep invitin' 'em ... Image








Sorry Goalie ... couldn't let that one pass! Image

Tell ya what ... you come to Oakdale Thursday nites this coming summer, and we'll let ya do whatever kinda mag-changes ya want!

Normally, an RO 'er someone'd point out to ya that there's a better way ... but I'll even personally make an announcement 'fore the match, that there's no need fer anyone to make any such comments.

No penalties ... no criticism ... nothin' but good shootin'! Image
Last edited by rugersol on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby Keith on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:08 am

Like Dan, I was going to stay out of this as I haven't shot IDPA in over two years.

I have never been in combat. Nor do I plan on it. But, if I were ever to find myself in that situation, I would agree with Goalie and suspect that partially dis-assembling a perfectly good functioning firearm (removing magazine) in the middle of a firefight would be a bad idea.
Yeah, but I shoot with THIS hand.
User avatar
Keith
 
Posts: 756 [View]
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:08 am
Location: Buffalo, MN

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby westberg on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:14 am

Keith wrote:Like Dan, I was going to stay out of this as I haven't shot IDPA in over two years.

I have never been in combat. Nor do I plan on it. But, if I were ever to find myself in that situation, I would agree with Goalie and suspect that partially dis-assembling a perfectly good functioning firearm (removing magazine) in the middle of a firefight would be a bad idea.

In a real gun fight I couldn't agree more with you and Goalie, setting here in my living room trying to imagine what a real gun fight would be like.

But in the world of IDPA reloads are king............ :P :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
westberg
 
Posts: 4830 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Wyoming, MN

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby goalie on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:15 am

westberg wrote:No my comment was in regards to playing a game, I'm sure you are very good at hockey and I bet you play by the rules.


Playing goal in competitive hockey is a lot like a gunfight in that if you are not cheating, you are not trying......

:mrgreen:
It turns out that what you have is less important than what you do with it.
User avatar
goalie
 
Posts: 3812 [View]
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:45 pm

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby hammAR on Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:48 am

Let's see....training-practice.... practice-training....
in a bad situation you will revert to your level of training-practice......
so IF you practice-train for a game with rules,
then you will revert to your level of training-practice in a real such situation......
tactical reloads, standing in a doorway clearing a malfunction, etc., etc.
so you look pretty, your form is correct, and get a good time/score.....
back to the argument/discussion that games are great for real world situations........
very few of the situations in the games are survivable to begin with..
so yea, right....in the real world they will get you a hole in the ground....

BTW: this thread is no longer humorous........ :P
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: IDPA Rules, Explained Humorously

Postby Pat Cannon on Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:27 am

Hockey is not combat training. But if two guys get in a fistfight, who's got the better odds: the guy who plays hockey regularly or the guy who sits on his butt and reads a lot of martial arts forums on the internet?

And perhaps more relevant, since neither guy actually gets in fistfights anymore, which guy has more fun during an average week?

IDPA is not combat training. But if you actually take your gun out of the safe and shoot it regularly under some friendly competitive pressure, you'll learn some stuff, about yourself and about your gun, that you won't learn from reading, or from punching paper at Bill's.

Sure, if I could go to Thunder Ranch every month I'd be way better. What's that got to do with reality?
User avatar
Pat Cannon
 
Posts: 3894 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: South Minneapolis

PreviousNext

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron