911scanner wrote:Seeing this:

Gives a seller in Minnesota a reasonable defense in regards to this:
A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who intentionally transfers a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon to another if the person knows that the transferee:
(1) has been denied a permit to carry under section 624.714 because the transferee is not eligible under section 624.713 to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon;
(2) has been found ineligible to possess a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon by a chief of police or sheriff as a result of an application for a transferee permit or a transfer report; or
(3) is disqualified under section 624.713 from possessing a pistol or semiautomatic military-style assault weapon.
Unnecessary. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove "intentionally". And above totally omits any mention of non "assault weapon" long guns. Not gonna sell a shotgun or deer rifle to a dude who doesn't give a damn about handguns or "assault weapons"? Didn't have the time to waste to fill out some silly and unnecessary by law state form and wait a couple weeks? Really?
When was the last time a normal (non druggie, non-home-boy-gang-banger, non-skinhead, non-I'm selling this gun to you so you can shoot your/my wife, I hope you're getting my point) was prosecuted (successfully or not) for making a personal sale to a buyer who claimed they were not prohibited (and the seller had no direct knowledge to the contrary)? Really?
Don't be *****-bliss-ninny-whipped on this folks. It's the same as selling a car or a used canoe.