XDM45 wrote:FJ540 wrote:XDM45 wrote:Well, reloads may be quality, but I have some issues with them:
1) I KNOW my new brass casing in my new ammo hasn't been used, and when it is, it will be used once by me, but with reloads, I don't have any idea how many times the same casing has been used.
2) Many people who reload use non-jacket bullets because it's cheaper, and I don't want that much lead mess in my gun. (Not sure how many people use jacketed bullets when they reload, but my guess is not many.)
3) As for the cost of reloading per round, yeah it's generally cheaper than new rounds are; of course I could see it costing the same or more depending on components used as far as quality and price paid, even so, what about the cost of your time to reload? Do people factor that in? What is YOUR time per hour worth? At some point, it will cost you more money to reload than to just buy new when you figure in your time per hour.
4) It's not me loading it. I know I'm not reloading new rounds either, but the ammo companies have quality control, consistency, insurance in case someone sues their butt off, etc. If any kind of legal case was ever brought against them, they have the cash whereas Uncle Bob loading in his basement does not. I know you put your trust in someone else whether they are reloading it for you, or if you're buying new rounds, but I'd rather put my trust in the ammo company.
5) It's my gun. That trumps all other things above. My gun. No reloads.
Comparatively speaking, most people don't load their own bullets,they buy new, just like most people don't roll their own cigarettes when they can buy packs, or most people compile their own operating system's kernel when they can run just use a pre-made one instead, even though when you do something yourself, get more control over it.
You have no idea about reloading. Might want to gather some more info before making assumptions.
#5 still applies.
Would you allow reloads on a range you owned?