by XDM45 on Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:39 pm
So while I was out today, what do I see, but a Honda Civic. It was an older model, rusted, and driven by someone who looked like they didn't make a whole lot of money. Of course I immediately thought of this thread and in my mind, compared it to a Glock and a Glock owner......
1) Most gun owners must make some decent wages I would think because let's face it, guns, ammo, supplies, tools, memberships, it aren't cheap. Some gun owners probably live on a fixed income or choose to spend their money on guns and such vs. other things; but I'm thinking that's probably the exception vs. the rule. I think it'd be interesting to know the average income of the average gun owner. Anyway, the guy driving that Civic looked like he could barely afford McDonalds, let alone a Glock.
2) NO self-respecting gun owner (let alone a Glock owner) would EVER let their tools rust like that Civic did; nor would they ever be seen with such a rusted piece either. Of the two, I think the Glock is held to and made with higher standards than the Honda Civics are. I know, apples to oranges, cars to guns, but I'm still just saying.......
3) The one thing the Civic had in common with Glocks is it was loud since it didn't have a muffler (Thanks MN for outlawing Suppressors!!) Unlike the Glock's firing noise, the Civic's noise was much more annoying.
4) I did see the Civic, it was rusted the driver looked broke, and the above is written in humor. If you're offended, then all I have to ask is where were you driving to on 35E South today?
Carry on............
Gnothi Seauton