PRS wrote:I understand the short version theory.... If the primer goes the bullet will be pushed out of the case. If the primer goes and the powder does not, how could it go later? Does modern powder ever smolder then ignite? It's not like the primer can be hit then go seconds later...
PRS wrote:hmm sounds fishy to me....
jshuberg wrote:If it doesn't fire, tap rack bang.
Evad wrote:jshuberg wrote:If it doesn't fire, tap rack bang.
OK...this is all conjecture since I have never had it happen. Say it happens, and right when you pull the slide back, you get detonation. What happens?
Ironbear wrote:Evad wrote:jshuberg wrote:If it doesn't fire, tap rack bang.
OK...this is all conjecture since I have never had it happen. Say it happens, and right when you pull the slide back, you get detonation. What happens?
The powder needs containment to get up to full burn rate, so if the slide was partially open you would likely blow the case. If you had managed to fully eject it, you would likely have case and bullet going off in opposite directions, at rates inversely proportional to their respective masses, but without the full fury. It still could be hazardous, but nothing like muzzle velocity. It would be similar to the hazard of tossing live rounds into a fire.
In one of Hathaway Capstick's stories, he talked about a batch of rifle ammo, that would hang-fire... sometimes as long as a second. He suggested it as a real mark of a rifleman, if you were capable of following through your trigger pull by keeping the rifle on target until it went off!
2in2out wrote:I once responded to a fire at an indoor shooting range in our service area. By the time we got there, the fire was "rockin' and rollin'". There was so much ammo in that building, we just sat back and fought a defensive strategy. It sounded like a big popcorn machine... for an hour. Bits and pieces would often land at our feet. One of our guys got a little too close, and something popped him in the shoulder. But, that's as far as anyone got to being injured by the ammo cooking off.
igofast wrote:Here's another one:
Of course he claims the gun just went off on it's own. Is this the new 'tactical' way to holster your gun, without looking at it? I've always 'looked' the gun back into the holster - maybe I'm behind the times.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests