FJ540 wrote:My 1911 bias came from some random guy who let me shoot one of his guns.
Similar here and now my 1911's go to the range to show off with suppressors.

FJ540 wrote:My 1911 bias came from some random guy who let me shoot one of his guns.
Hmac wrote:crbutler wrote:HMAC you are welcome to disagree, but perhaps you should give me/us a detailed point that my opinion is a problem? Or as you said, unprintable.
Thank you. Yes, I do disagree.crbutler wrote:Shooting a SBR with comp is showing off at an indoor range, it's saying look at me and my unusual gun. Any NFA item is at a public indoor range. What functional goal are you getting doing that in a public setting? A suppressor is kind of saying the same, at least until they become common, but at least you are not disturbing others.
Disagree
crbutler wrote:The .223 is not a sub 100 yard rifle, nor is the AR platform a short distance item. I have shot enough 3-400 yard prairie dogs to know better. It's been a while, but the M16 I was issued was zeroed at 200 yards according to the sights... Maybe police doctrine and training is that way, and I will admit 3 gun shooting is often done at short distance, but that is not because the rifle was designed for that, and frankly if you can hit a target at 100, it's easy to hit one at 10.
crbutler wrote:I am still saying shooting indoors at short distances with a comped centerfire rifle around other people is boorish behavior. Some uncomped guns are horrible too, such as SBRs and true magnum rifles. You can get plenty of trigger time with rimfire rifles and standard pistols without making everyone else uncomfortable. For the true case where you have no other gun, it would be forgivable, but frankly I don't know anyone who has only one gun and that is a comped AR, even those who have boating accidents regularly.
crbutler wrote:I do know that battle sight zero on the M16 is 0-200. The ammo specs are such that out of an M4 (which is a SBR by definition) it should be both accurate and lethal past 400 yards.
crbutler wrote:As to my point about NFA weapons, it's essentially that an indoor range is generally a gathering of general public shooters. Most recognize that an SBR, MG, or suppressor are not allowed in general ownership, and in fact most folks when seeing some of my stuff have said "that's illegal" to the point I had the sheriff called on me when I was shooting on private land. Shure, most go "that's cool" and ask to try them, but do we really need to show off our toys in public? I cannot really see a point to it except to show off unless it is a suppressor, but even then most folks take those out in public to show off, and at an indoor range, it sure isn't to allow you to shoot without hearing protection...
crbutler wrote:Hmac wrote:crbutler wrote:HMAC you are welcome to disagree, but perhaps you should give me/us a detailed point that my opinion is a problem? Or as you said, unprintable.
Thank you. Yes, I do disagree.crbutler wrote:Shooting a SBR with comp is showing off at an indoor range, it's saying look at me and my unusual gun. Any NFA item is at a public indoor range. What functional goal are you getting doing that in a public setting? A suppressor is kind of saying the same, at least until they become common, but at least you are not disturbing others.
Disagree
I guess this is just a matter of opinion.
crbutler wrote:The .223 is not a sub 100 yard rifle, nor is the AR platform a short distance item. I have shot enough 3-400 yard prairie dogs to know better. It's been a while, but the M16 I was issued was zeroed at 200 yards according to the sights... Maybe police doctrine and training is that way, and I will admit 3 gun shooting is often done at short distance, but that is not because the rifle was designed for that, and frankly if you can hit a target at 100, it's easy to hit one at 10.
crbutler wrote:I am still saying shooting indoors at short distances with a comped centerfire rifle around other people is boorish behavior. Some uncomped guns are horrible too, such as SBRs and true magnum rifles. You can get plenty of trigger time with rimfire rifles and standard pistols without making everyone else uncomfortable. For the true case where you have no other gun, it would be forgivable, but frankly I don't know anyone who has only one gun and that is a comped AR, even those who have boating accidents regularly.
crbutler wrote:I do know that battle sight zero on the M16 is 0-200. The ammo specs are such that out of an M4 (which is a SBR by definition) it should be both accurate and lethal past 400 yards.
crbutler wrote:As to my point about NFA weapons, it's essentially that an indoor range is generally a gathering of general public shooters. Most recognize that an SBR, MG, or suppressor are not allowed in general ownership, and in fact most folks when seeing some of my stuff have said "that's illegal" to the point I had the sheriff called on me when I was shooting on private land. Shure, most go "that's cool" and ask to try them, but do we really need to show off our toys in public? I cannot really see a point to it except to show off unless it is a suppressor, but even then most folks take those out in public to show off, and at an indoor range, it sure isn't to allow you to shoot without hearing protection...
crbutler wrote:Essentially, yes.
Indoor range where it will be louder than the norm and folks will be concerned about appearances, yes. And yes, I think that folks can tell the difference between a 11.5" AR and a M4gery. Wouldn't take too many shots to hear the diffence either, with a comp. Especially if you are someone trying to practice CQB technique stuff.
Personally I am fine with live and let live, but if you are trying to shoot together on an indoor range, some folks insistence on using stuff that doesn't quite fit the milieu will disrupt it for others. Would you want to be in there when someone decides to shoot an overbore magnum or .50 BMG? That's about a similar order of magnitude above a comped .223 that a comped .223 is above a standard handgun. The owners will decide what they allow, it's their business and they can decide without my say so.
The point of this thread I thought was what is courteous to your fellow indoor range shooters. In a full indoor range a CF rifle or such is not. Even with a muzzle baffle, the sound echos off the walls. The fact that so many here bring SBR's and such to them (really I have never seen one except at Bills back when they rented them) is in my opinion, showing off, see what a neat toy (or what a hardcore bad ass i am) that worsens the experience for others. If it's a noted time to use one, a dedicated rifle bay, or there is no one else there, I would have no objections to it, but that is pretty far afield there, and really when is the last time you have been at a indoor range without a few people shooting?
Snakeman721 wrote:Being a SRO at Osseo Gun club, I've seen plenty of ARs comped and non-comped. There is a BIG difference shooting a comped AR and a magnum rifle or 460 handgun. The biggest difference is that the comped AR usually blows anything lightweight off the neighboring lane tables like empty ammo boxes, paper targets, etc. They are VERY unsettling and LOUD. Yes, I'm required to wear double hearing protection, but in my opinion, comped ARs are louder and more nasty than magnum rifles or handguns. After I observe the shooter shooting in a safe manner, I usually leave the bay and observe elsewhere. Why should I stick around for the abuse?
Ghost wrote:It's even more exciting to pull out my 460 at BPR. Only allowed in the rifle bay and last time I was there the concussion reset the target machines after every shot. Not to mention stuff falling out of the ceiling on you.
Erud wrote:Man, I love a good internet purse fight!
Ghost wrote:crbutler wrote:Essentially, yes.
Indoor range where it will be louder than the norm and folks will be concerned about appearances, yes. And yes, I think that folks can tell the difference between a 11.5" AR and a M4gery. Wouldn't take too many shots to hear the diffence either, with a comp. Especially if you are someone trying to practice CQB technique stuff.
Personally I am fine with live and let live, but if you are trying to shoot together on an indoor range, some folks insistence on using stuff that doesn't quite fit the milieu will disrupt it for others. Would you want to be in there when someone decides to shoot an overbore magnum or .50 BMG? That's about a similar order of magnitude above a comped .223 that a comped .223 is above a standard handgun. The owners will decide what they allow, it's their business and they can decide without my say so.
The point of this thread I thought was what is courteous to your fellow indoor range shooters. In a full indoor range a CF rifle or such is not. Even with a muzzle baffle, the sound echos off the walls. The fact that so many here bring SBR's and such to them (really I have never seen one except at Bills back when they rented them) is in my opinion, showing off, see what a neat toy (or what a hardcore bad ass i am) that worsens the experience for others. If it's a noted time to use one, a dedicated rifle bay, or there is no one else there, I would have no objections to it, but that is pretty far afield there, and really when is the last time you have been at a indoor range without a few people shooting?
I have had the rifle bay to myself quite often at BPR.
Your demonization of SBR's is both hilarious and appalling.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests