What would it take to convince you to serve as a juror in the Derik Chauvin trial?
Ain't no way I'd walk into that minefield.
armedwalleye wrote:Dunno what it would take, but I would point out that he'll be judged by a jury of his peers...none of which were smart enough to get out of jury duty.
Greg wrote:People always say stuff like this and then wonder why we get so many weird jury decisions. The whole system depends on reasonable jurors.
Greg
Rip Van Winkle wrote:If ever there was a case that needed a change of venue, this is it.
Drizzle wrote:What I don't understand is why he and the other three seem to have opted for jury trials. I would think a judicial trial would be a much better option for their cases.
Anyone know why or want to posit an idea?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests