Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby oscar on Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:41 am

MORE flip-flopping djaw dropping BS :roll: :roll:


By LIZ SIDOTI and LIBBY QUAID – 13 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Rudy Giuliani, who sued firearms manufacturers and called for tough gun control as New York's mayor, said Tuesday the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and a recent court ruling framed his current defense of a right to own guns.

"You have to look at all of these issues in light of the different concerns that now exist, which is terrorism, the terrorists' war on us," the Republican presidential contender told The Associated Press in an interview. He also mentioned immigration and border security.

He said his thinking on gun rights also was influenced by a federal appeals court decision that overturned a 30-year-old ban on private ownership of handguns in Washington on the grounds that the Constitution gives individual citizens the right to own guns.

"It is a very, very strong description of how important personal liberties are in this country and how we have to respect them," he said of the ruling, adding it "sort of maybe even did more to crystalize my thinking on the whole gun issue in light of Sept. 11."

"I think, after Sept. 11 — I mean I probably would have had the same impression before, I'm not sure — but after Sept. 11, all that seemed much more powerful to me," Giuliani said.

His embrace of gun rights appears to have occurred more recently than the months after the 2001 attacks. He was quoted in 2002 and 2004 — years later — staunchly supporting gun control.

In a 20-minute interview in a conference room at his Times Square office, Giuliani explained his thinking on the Second Amendment five days after he sought to reassure the National Rifle Association of his support for gun rights, telling the group Friday in Washington that the 2001 attacks highlighted the need for them. Before the same group, Giuliani's rivals, Fred Thompson and John McCain, tried to exploit Giuliani's past support for strict gun control measures.

As mayor, Giuliani sued gun makers and distributors, backed a federal assault weapons ban and once described the NRA as extremist. As a candidate for the GOP nomination, he is struggling to square that record with his need to win over a Republican base made up of conservatives who fiercely defend — and in some cases base their votes on — the Second Amendment.

He no longer argues, as gun control advocates do, that the right to bear arms applies only to the rights of states to maintain citizen militias. He now says that right also applies to individuals as well, and he cites the court ruling, Parker v. District of Columbia, that said the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own handguns.

In the 1990s, he lobbied Congress to ban assault weapons. Now, aides have said it's not clear he would support such a ban.

Giuliani also went from suing the gun industry in 2000 to telling the NRA on Friday that he dislikes the unintended consequences of that lawsuit, which still is working its way through the courts.

In the interview, Giuliani said, "The case took a lot of twists and turns in the direction of trying to get a lot of information about the tracing of guns that would be used for private lawsuits" instead of solely for law enforcement purposes.

"I didn't anticipate that when I brought the case," he said.

The ex-mayor spoke as the campaign of Democratic rival Chris Dodd and the International Association of Fire Fighters castigated him over a supporter's fundraiser seeking $9.11 from attendees. The critics argued the event exploits the terrorist attacks for political purposes. Giuliani aides called the $9.11 idea "an unfortunate choice" that was done without the campaign's knowledge.

On other issues in the interview, Giuliani:

_Backed President Bush's veto threat of a bill in the Democratic-led Congress that would renew and expand a health insurance program that provides coverage for 6 million children. The bill would boost spending by $35 billion to cover 4 million more children.

"It's a not-so-hidden step toward socialized medicine," Giuliani said. "This is one where the Democrats are playing on emotions, but the reality of it is, it will be very, very dangerous to move children from the more desirable form of coverage, private, to the less desirable form of coverage, which is government."

_Refused to rule out raising taxes to offset a Social Security shortfall. He said he would assemble a bipartisan group to develop ideas for fixing Social Security, perhaps even before his inauguration.

"I am opposed to tax increases, but I would look at whatever proposal they came up with and try to figure out how we can come up with a bipartisan way to do it," Giuliani said, adding that potential solutions must come from both parties. "The reality is, I'm more concerned about Medicare and Medicaid than I am with Social Security, because I'm pretty sure we can solve Social Security."

_Argued that he is the only Republican candidate who can ensure the party competes in Democratic-leaning states, such as California and New York.

"I think political professionals would tell you that if my opponents get the nomination, a day after the convention, no matter what they say, the Republican Party operation closes down in 20 states, and then we concentrate on the remaining states," Giuliani said. "I think they would tell you that if I get the nomination, there'll be a Republican Party operation in virtually every state, and then as the campaign goes on, we'll assess where we are."
oscar
 
Posts: 4 [View]
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:28 pm

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby rucker on Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:50 am

That's disgusting, I have no respect for someone whose beliefs change with the wind :shock:
rucker
 
Posts: 1848 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:51 pm

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby Andrew Rothman on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:25 am

We can certainly trust him...















...as far as we can spit him.
User avatar
Andrew Rothman
 
Posts: 624 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:42 am

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby princewally on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:05 pm

Andrew Rothman wrote:We can certainly trust him...


...as far as we can spit him.


I can hit 30+ feet on a good day, with no wind. I don't trust him that far.
Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.
User avatar
princewally
 
Posts: 1995 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: st louis park

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby 1911fan on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:30 pm

Everytime I hear giuliani talk, in the background I hear the "tea for two" tap dance music from the Carson Tonight show......
User avatar
1911fan
 
Posts: 6545 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Location: 35 W and Hwy 10

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby Andrew Rothman on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:53 pm

princewally wrote:
Andrew Rothman wrote:We can certainly trust him...

..as far as we can spit him.


I can hit 30+ feet on a good day, with no wind. I don't trust him that far.



You can spit a Giuliani 30 feet? :D
User avatar
Andrew Rothman
 
Posts: 624 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:42 am

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby princewally on Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:23 pm

Sorry, I read that as "spit on him", which is a good sentiment, too.
Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.
User avatar
princewally
 
Posts: 1995 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: st louis park

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby nyffman on Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:44 am

You have to give him an "A" for effort though. Considering that the game of politics is what it is, his only acceptable option was to use the two most critical issues as his reasons for a change of heart. Having said that, I still don't consider him to be an acceptable option at this point.
our quarrel is not about the value of freedom per se, but stems from our opinion of our fellow men … a man’s admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him --Alexis de Tocqueville--
User avatar
nyffman
 
Posts: 5176 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:46 am

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby Dick Unger on Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:49 am

What he needs to do is prevent single issue (2A) voters from voting for a third party. (Since they won't vote Clinton, that's all he needs.) He probably has succeeded. He'll do the same for right to lifers, go to church a couple of times, and presto, every every right winger in America will support a New York liberal, for President.

America is the most tolerant place on earth. Anyone can grow up to be anything they aspire to be. A person posing as a liberal can grow up to be the leader of all the conservatives. Watch and see.

I predict the NRA will endorse him. They are following the same strategy as Giuliani; they want to be the leader in proposing new gun control. If gun control proposals go away, then the NRA directors will lose all their influence in Washinton, and not be invited to all the fun political events. After attending Washington parties with celebreties, Saturday at the shooting range would be bo-oring.

There are also a lot of moderate "usually" Republicans who will not vote for anything associated with the Bush administration/ "neocon" people. They WILL vote Clinton but can be pulled back by Guiliani.

Single issue voters are 2 to 5% of the voters; enough to turn the whole election.
Dick Unger
 
Posts: 733 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby Pat on Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:11 pm

Dick Unger wrote:A person posing as a liberal can grow up to be the leader of all the conservatives. Watch and see.

Do you really think he has been just "posing" all this time?? Nah...
"Happiness is...finding two olives in your martini when you're hungry." -Johnny Carson
Cardinal Kung Foundation , The Rule of Saint Benedict
User avatar
Pat
 
Posts: 3567 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Western Burbs

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby cmj685 on Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:38 am

So this poses a provocatively hard question, and one many of us may have to answer sooner rather than later: if the candidates of the two major parties are Clinton and this new Giuliani, where does the voter who believes that the gun/2nd amendment issue is the key indicator for any candidate's views of government and people (http://mnguntalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=902) go with his vote? Here is another case of how the two-party system is a disastrous failure. Do you "throw away" a vote on a third party or write-in candidate? Take the best possible choice of the two? Sit out the election in protest? Or protest the current administration's policies by voting for the other party? I think many of us may be between a rock and a hard place on this--and the many other issues which gun rights preview. Would be interested to hear some discussion on what many of you are thinking if the election shapes up this way (which appears somewhat likely at this point).
I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.
User avatar
cmj685
 
Posts: 1201 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:53 am
Location: Shoreview

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby selurcspi on Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:30 am

cmj685 wrote:So this poses a provocatively hard question, and one many of us may have to answer sooner rather than later: if the candidates of the two major parties are Clinton and this new Giuliani, where does the voter who believes that the gun/2nd amendment issue is the key indicator for any candidate's views of government and people (http://mnguntalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=902) go with his vote? Here is another case of how the two-party system is a disastrous failure. Do you "throw away" a vote on a third party or write-in candidate? Take the best possible choice of the two? Sit out the election in protest? Or protest the current administration's policies by voting for the other party? I think many of us may be between a rock and a hard place on this--and the many other issues which gun rights preview. Would be interested to hear some discussion on what many of you are thinking if the election shapes up this way (which appears somewhat likely at this point).


Choose the one that will do the least harm in other areas. :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
NRA, MADFI, MN DNR, Certified Instructor

"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."
Margaret Thatcher
User avatar
selurcspi
 
Posts: 2325 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Mild, Mild West.....Burbs

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby JoeH on Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:12 am

cmj685 wrote:So this poses a provocatively hard question, and one many of us may have to answer sooner rather than later: if the candidates of the two major parties are Clinton and this new Giuliani, where does the voter who believes that the gun/2nd amendment issue is the key indicator for any candidate's views of government and people go with his vote?


I believe in the right to form a militia :)
Joe
Not a Glock Certified Armorer
User avatar
JoeH
 
Posts: 3687 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:56 am
Location: 1911 JMB Drive

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby Rags on Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:25 am

Here is another case of how the two-party system is a disastrous failure. Do you "throw away" a vote on a third party or write-in candidate?


The two-party system has always been a failure in this sense, but it is not going to be replaced at any time in the next several decades, if ever. Third parties have never succeeded on a national scale, and even when they appear to work in a statewide context -- Jess Ventura for one of the rare examples -- it's only because the candidate has an appeal that has nothing to do with politics. (And notice that slightly progun Jesse as governor got us nothing. Once he had his own carry permit he lost interest in the subject, and turned to getting us that swell train.)

So, yes, write-ins and third parties are truly throw-away votes. Sometimes that works for us, sometimes against. The moderately progun Dubya got elected in 2000 because thousands of idiots in Florida threw away their votes on Nader, which was disatrous for the antigun Gore.

The presumably progun Pat Buchanan siphoned off fewer votes than Nader, so our side lucked out. It's a matter of getting the least antigun person into office.

That would be whoever isn't Hillary.
-- Dave Matheny

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell
User avatar
Rags
 
Posts: 113 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Ogdenville, Brockway, and North Haverbrook

Re: Giuliani Defends Right to Bear Arms???.... for his aggenda o

Postby jac714 on Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:41 am

Rags wrote:
Here is another case of how the two-party system is a disastrous failure. Do you "throw away" a vote on a third party or write-in candidate?


The two-party system has always been a failure in this sense, but it is not going to be replaced at any time in the next several decades, if ever. Third parties have never succeeded on a national scale, and even when they appear to work in a statewide context -- Jess Ventura for one of the rare examples -- it's only because the candidate has an appeal that has nothing to do with politics. (And notice that slightly progun Jesse as governor got us nothing. Once he had his own carry permit he lost interest in the subject, and turned to getting us that swell train.)


As long as you don't count such third parties as the Republicans, Democrats and perhaps the most famous, the Bull Moose Party.

At one time both current major parties were third parties. I think the chance of a minor party becoming major are pretty slim in modern times but they have elected presidents in the past s well as become major parties.
"The 1911 was the design given by God to us through John M. Browning that represents the epitome of what a killing tool needs to be. It was true in 1911 and is true now."

IFIA MCPPA Instructor
DNR FAS Instructor
User avatar
jac714
 
Posts: 1392 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Next

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

cron